The court ruling means the dismissal of Miami Twp. the police officer will be reinstated on November 8

To exploreThe Best of Dayton vote is underway; find out how to vote!

The ruling includes that he will receive “all wages and benefits lost with restored seniority, less all wages and benefits earned due to employment elsewhere during the period from May 21, 2019 until his date of termination. back to work “.

The township’s board of directors appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, but Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor wrote on October 12 that “after reviewing the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court refuses to ‘accept the jurisdiction of the appeal… ”

In recommending the dismissal of Hesler, Miami Twp. Police Chief Charlie Stiegelmeyer noted the veteran officer’s violation of the department’s registration policy, code of conduct and core values, according to township documents. Hesler, who was a union leader and former K-9 manager, also made what the township called “insensitive racial” comments to a policewoman.

To exploreRELATED: Miami Twp Licensee. officer hired by Perry Twp. police department

His dismissal follows a claim by a department supervisor “that Hesler was lying,” a decision released in June by appeals judge Michael Tucker.

Hesler’s lawyer Stephen Lazarus told the outlet on Monday that his client was “just excited to get back to work and move on.” He said it should take place on November 8.

Hesler was hired as a police officer in July 2019 by Perry Twp., But Miami Twp., Because his Perry Twp. the salary was not as high as he was paid by Miami Twp., Lazarus said.

The Dayton Daily News contacted Miami Twp. trustees regarding the Ohio Supreme Court decision.

“When the details of Mr. Hesler’s performance were presented to the Trustees, we felt the termination for cause was warranted,” Morris said. “When Mr. Hesler challenged his termination for cause and an initial decision was made in his favor, the Trustees (current Trustees Don Culp and John Morris and former Trustee Doug Barry) were given the opportunity to settle the matter. case and Mr. Hesler would have remained of our police force.

Morris said he was in favor of this option because “avoiding the court and the unknown future verdict for an acceptable price is the best option”, but an administrator insisted he would never support any “buyback” .

“Our legal counsel indicated that they believed we could win on the appeal,” he said. “The trustees ultimately voted to continue the appeal knowing the additional legal costs along the way.”

Morris said he disagreed with the final ruling, but respects the court ruling.

Administrator Terry Posey Jr. said the litigation process began before his appointment as administrator in January 2020, and the case now ends with the court ruling.

“As a lawyer and trustee, I respect the rule of law, court decisions and the contract between the municipality, the police department and its uniformed officers,” Posey said. “Personally, I look forward to Mr. Hesler’s return to work.”

Culp could not be reached for comment before the press deadlines Monday.

Source link

Comments are closed.