Outside The Wire: Explanation Of Netflix’s Military Sci-Fi Movie

Outside the wire is now available on Netflix, as well as the sci-fi military action ends on a sudden, to say the least. Since its release on January 15, the photo, which features Anthony mackie and Damson idris, has received mixed reviews. Part of the reason for the lackluster reception is a confusing final act filled with twists and turns, shifting alliances, and weird thematic messages.

The general plot of Outside the Wire is quite normal for the genre. Lieutenant Harp, played by Damson Idris, is an American drone pilot who transfers from his remote US station to a military outpost in Ukraine. Fighting between Russian-backed warlords competing for dominance, a group of rebel soldiers, and the US “peacekeeping” army stationed in the demilitarized zone tore Ukraine apart in 2036. Harp joins Captain Leo (Mackie), a prototype AI / cyborg soldier, on a secret mission to take down a warlord in search of nuclear weapons.

The majority of the movie unfolds, but the final act features several betrayals and unexpected twists and turns. Outside the Wire tries to express a lot in a short time about the current American war machine and its influence in other parts of the world, but gunfire and explosions choke much of the message. Here’s what happens at the end of Outside the Wire.

Out of the wire: fine

Outside the Wire is not holding back. At the beginning, Leo informed Harp that their job is to locate the nuclear launch codes before the warlord Victor Koval (Pilou Asbk) launches an attack on the United States. However, once the codes are obtained, Leo admits he had ulterior goals from the start. He tricks Harp into disconnecting his trackers and controlling the microchip so he can operate outside the jurisdiction of the US Army, then knocks Harp down and takes him to meet Koval.


After a short failed negotiation, Leo executes Koval, learns the location of the secret missile silos, and plans his own attack on America with the nuclear weapons he now has access to. Meanwhile, Harp is kidnapped by Sofia (Emily Beecham), a local orphanage administrator who turns out to be the commander of the rebel movement. Sofiya gives a short tirade on the evils of the US military-industrial complex before releasing Harp, claiming that Leo is right to teach the US a lesson.


Harp returns to base, alerts Colonel Eckhart (Michael Kelly), and walks in to stop Leo. Harp confronts Leo in the missile silo, wondering why he wants to bomb the United States before ordering a drone strike to destroy the launch control center and save the day. Harp is informed that Leo is dead and that he will be transferred home.

Read more: Sinner season 4 release date: everything we know

Outside The Wire: Did Leo Betray the US Army?

Leo’s betrayal comes so quickly and in such a muddled montage that his true intentions are hard to pin down. Sofiya claims that Leo “can’t lie to himself,” that he feels guilty for being a tool in America’s ruthless war machine, and that his planned strike is a justifiable response to the suffering inflicted by troops like Harp. However, Leo’s renegade goal isn’t just driven by this.

Leo tells Harp in his final moments that his goal was to persuade America to end the AI ​​/ cyborg program that produced him. He doesn’t go into details, but it looks like if he kills millions of people, the US military will be forced to stop producing new troops like him because of the threat they pose.


His reasoning behind this choice is unclear, but it seems either he sees himself (and others like him) as a legitimate outgrowth of the war machine he is trying to stop, or that ‘he understood something more devilish about himself and the abilities of his kind.

In the same speech, Leo says the strike aims to teach the United States a lesson about the consequences of its repeated conflicts. This indicates that his intention to end the Android program is linked to his general dissatisfaction with the military-industrial complex. In essence, he thinks warriors like him will only add to the pain of the world, and he wants them stopped. However, the title streak appears to represent many more cyborgs in development, implying a bleak future.

Off the wire: anti-war message

Outside the Wire seeks to critique the current state of war and the military-industrial complex, in the same vein as anti-war films like Platoon and Full Metal Jacket. Unfortunately, he is not keeping his promise by not delivering a clear message. Leo and Sofiya provide a nuanced view of US military engagement in international affairs, which they say is almost always driven by power grabbing that rejects hapless foreigners as civilian victims. However, that’s about as far as the movie is set to go.


Leo and Sofiya’s determination to destroy America comes at a significant and inevitable cost (millions of deaths, as the film repeatedly points out), which sadly makes their beliefs appear just as irrational. It’s an unusual approach: If Sofiya wasn’t okay with the war machine but opposed Leo’s tougher efforts to stop it, the movie might have had a more intriguing discussion of how to solve the problem. Instead, the overall message seems to be simply that the war is terrible, with few attempts made in the last act to resolve the film’s more complicated issues. Ultimately, despite some intriguing concepts, it falls short of its potential.

Read more: Locke and Key Season 2: Cast | Scenario | End explanation

Off the Wire: Conclusion

The conclusion of Outside the Wire is a warning about the influence of technology on combat. Harp’s flying drone, Leo’s “gump” combat robots fighting alongside real soldiers all offer a terrifying vision of a near future where conflicts unfold indefinitely since the humans who lead them are not the ones at risk.

Supposedly, Leo wants the Android program to be over because he believes that if troops like him were to become the common warriors of the future, humanity would be subjected to even more ruthless brutality from the strongest. That seems to be the point of the finale, and while Outside the Wire frequently avoids hammering the argument in favor of a broad philosophy, that’s definitely the question.

Stay tuned to TheShahab for the latest update.

Comments are closed.