Police department – NYPD Holy Name http://nypdholyname.com/ Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:20:48 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.3 https://nypdholyname.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/icon-47-120x120.png Police department – NYPD Holy Name http://nypdholyname.com/ 32 32 No one prays at the house of the Slumlord https://nypdholyname.com/no-one-prays-at-the-house-of-the-slumlord/ Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:20:48 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/no-one-prays-at-the-house-of-the-slumlord/ I recently saw a post online about people praying the rosary outside the public library. It’s a gathering they planned to “fix” for Drag Queen Story Hour. They think Jesus is offended by Drag Queen Story Hour, and as far as I can tell, he is. They think praying a rosary will cheer him up. […]]]>

I recently saw a post online about people praying the rosary outside the public library. It’s a gathering they planned to “fix” for Drag Queen Story Hour.

They think Jesus is offended by Drag Queen Story Hour, and as far as I can tell, he is. They think praying a rosary will cheer him up. And as far as I know, it will.

But I can’t help but notice that no one has ever prayed a rosary to make amends outside of a payday loan office, where the poor go into crushing debt just to buy themselves a few more weeks of life. No one prays the Rosary outside of a furniture and appliance rental scam, which amounts to the same thing. No one prays the Rosary except for used car dealerships offering predatory loans. No one prays the rosary except pawnbrokers. When my friends pawned their coats and boots to buy food, no one made any repairs for it.

No one prayed a Rosary to make amends outside a row of gentrified houses after the poor were evicted. No one prayed for a repair outside a slum building where the landlord doesn’t fix the furnace, where tenants have to hang towels from the windows and sleep in their coats to stay alive. No one prayed the Rosary outside the city’s utility department office when the water for the poor was turned off. No one prayed when the City closed the park and demolished the playground to deter drug dealers or when children found a needle in the vacant lot. No one prayed when the wreckage where homeless people were building a campfire burned.

No one prayed outside the slumlord’s house when a building caught fire because the slumlord had forgotten to install smoke detectors, and an entire family burned to death. Neighbors built a small shrine where the house stood, with flowers, teddy bears and a wooden cross, but no one was praying at the slumber merchant. Nobody prayed outside the building with the black mold and the broken air conditioner, when people started getting sick. No one prayed where the homeless camp was “cleansed” by the city, and the homeless lost everything they had.

No one prayed outside the grocery store who called the police over the person who shoplifted a few boxes of pop pies at the end of a tough month, even though it would be cheaper for everyone world o just give them pop pies or pretend not to see.

No one prays outside the courthouse when the drug addict goes to jail and loses their children, instead receiving mental health care before things get so out of control.

No one prays outside brothels.

No one prays outside the police station when they raid brothels and take enslaved women to jail instead of getting them to safety.

Nobody prays outside of school when the cafeteria refuses to give lunch to a child without money for lunch. No one prays outside the welfare office when they cut the family’s food stamps. No one but me prays when my friend texts that her baby hasn’t had formula all day because there’s none in town – because I’m the only one knowledge, apart from God.

No one prayed around the corner where this man overdosed, then dropped the needle on the floor and got on the city bus before his heart stopped.

No one prayed when the drug addict stole my daughter’s bike from the porch, then returned it and apologized when he couldn’t sell it. No one prayed when he finally overdosed and died last year.

Many of us gathered to pray in my neighborhood the day after a homeless man was shot. But I didn’t see the Catholics from the wealthy part of the neighborhood showing up with their rosaries. They stayed at home. They don’t like being in that neighborhood block, because it’s dangerous.

When the mentally ill inner city woman starved her baby to death, many people prayed. But we didn’t pray outside the Children’s Services office, where officers were repeatedly tipped off but nothing appears to have been done.

They think that Jesus, who wore a robe all the days of his life, is offended by a man who puts on a robe and a wig.

They don’t care about real sins.

Image via pixabay

Mary Pezzulo is the author of Meditations on the Way of the Cross, The Sorrows and Joys of Maryand Stumbling in Grace: How We Meet God in Tiny Works of Mercy.

Steel Magnificat works almost entirely on points. To tip the author, visit our donation page.


]]>
The map reveals which parts of the UK are struggling the most with the cost of living crisis – is your area on the list? https://nypdholyname.com/the-map-reveals-which-parts-of-the-uk-are-struggling-the-most-with-the-cost-of-living-crisis-is-your-area-on-the-list/ Thu, 09 Jun 2022 14:33:00 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/the-map-reveals-which-parts-of-the-uk-are-struggling-the-most-with-the-cost-of-living-crisis-is-your-area-on-the-list/ A MAP has revealed which parts of the UK are struggling the most with the cost of living crisis. New data shows which parts of the country are struggling the most – but also reveals Britons least concerned about price rises. 2 2 Search behavior was tracked by region for key terms including energy price […]]]>

A MAP has revealed which parts of the UK are struggling the most with the cost of living crisis.

New data shows which parts of the country are struggling the most – but also reveals Britons least concerned about price rises.

2

Search behavior was tracked by region for key terms including energy price cap and payday loans

2

Search behavior was tracked by region for key terms including energy price cap and payday loansCredit: Alamy

Residents of Manchester are struggling with the cost of living more than anyone else, becoming the worst-hit area in the UK based on population size.

The data showed that residents sought out the cheapest energy providers more than in any other region.

Manchester emerged as the worst-hit area in the UK based on population size.

Payday loans were searched 2,200 times per month, 210 searches for the energy price cap and 310 people searched for the cheapest energy providers.

My company is set to make £100,000 from teaching TWERKING after leaving my dream job
These six travel insurance mistakes could be costing you thousands

Newcastle followed closely as the second most affected city.

It had one of the highest searches for payday loans in the study with 1,000 people per month looking for quick ways to get cash and cover unexpected costs.

In third place, Leeds had one of the highest numbers of people seeking information on the energy price cap.

Glasgow has been revealed as the fourth most affected location, with searches for same day loans being the third most searched term across the UK.

Residents were also among the most eager to switch energy providers for the cheapest service.

Other Scottish cities feeling the cost of living effect were Aberdeen coming in 7th, Belfast 15th and Edinburgh 22nd.

Newport, Cardiff and the London Borough of Brent were the least affected areas.

These locations showed the fewest number of people searching online for information on energy price caps, fast loans, ways to save money, and information on the cheapest energy providers .

Reading, Sutton, Southampton, Birkenhead, Southend-on-Sea, Luton and Brent also showed weak and infrequent search patterns.

Data from the UK search engine was analyzed by self-storage experts Pink Storage to determine which areas were struggling the most against the ever-increasing cost of living.

Search behavior was tracked by region for key terms including energy price caps, payday loans, money saving and cheapest energy provider.

The best flight attendant safety tip - and all you need is a piece of toilet paper
I'm furious after the town hall sold my garden to my neighbors behind my back

A spokesperson for pink storage said: “The cost of living is a concern for most of us, by analyzing online search behavior we can see how people are trying to make ends meet.

“If wholesale energy prices remain high, we can expect further increases in energy prices and, as a result, online search behavior of internet users will reflect this.”

]]>
5 Best Online Payday Loans – Online Payday Loans Same Day Deposit & No Rejection Payday Loans Direct Lenders in 2022 https://nypdholyname.com/5-best-online-payday-loans-online-payday-loans-same-day-deposit-no-rejection-payday-loans-direct-lenders-in-2022/ Fri, 03 Jun 2022 06:26:00 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/5-best-online-payday-loans-online-payday-loans-same-day-deposit-no-rejection-payday-loans-direct-lenders-in-2022/ Online payday loans are the solution to almost any type of financial lock-up. Whether you need money to redecorate the spare bedroom, buy an expensive birthday present, or pay for an expensive car repair, online payday loans can provide you with the cash you need. Many Americans have experienced the financial flexibility offered by online […]]]>


Online payday loans are the solution to almost any type of financial lock-up. Whether you need money to redecorate the spare bedroom, buy an expensive birthday present, or pay for an expensive car repair, online payday loans can provide you with the cash you need. Many Americans have experienced the financial flexibility offered by online payday loans, and if you’re looking for financial relief, you can too.

Loan search services such as Viva Payday Loans give borrowers quick access to lenders offering the best payday loans online. With so many online payday loan providers, it can be difficult to choose the right one. This article features the top five direct online payday loan seekers on the market, putting you in direct contact with lenders.

Best online payday loans 2022 – a quick overview

What are the best online payday loans? See our top 5 below:

  • Viva Payday Loans – Best payday loans for fast payments
  • Heart Paydays – Best for No Disclaimer Payday Loans, Direct Lenders Only
  • Credit Clock – Best Online Payday Loans With Fast Approval Process
  • Money Lender Squad – Best for $255 payday loans online same day
  • Very Merry Loans – Best online payday loans with same day deposit

Best General Eligibility Criteria for Online Payday Loans

Borrowers must meet the following criteria to obtain payday loans online.

  • Must be 18 years or older
  • Must hold US residency
  • Must earn a minimum of $1,000 per month
  • Must pass accessibility checks
  • Must have a US bank account

If you have bad credit, you can still apply for the best payday loans online through Viva Payday Loans if you meet the criteria above. While none of the loan finder sites do credit checks on your name directly, lenders offering financing might.

Five Best Online Payday Loans: Same Day Deposit for Bad Credit

1. Viva Payday Loans – Best Payday Loans for Fast Payments

Projector wire

Viva Payday Loans is known for its fast turnaround time, providing access to lenders who offer the best payday loans online in the shortest possible time. To be a successful applicant, you must meet the above loan criteria and pass affordability checks. Once the loan is approved, the funds are disbursed to the borrower within an hour. Interest rates range from 5.99% to 35.99%, depending on the lender.

Advantages

  • Repayment terms from 2 to 24 months
  • Loan values ​​up to $5,000
  • Fast payments within 60 minutes of loan approval

The inconvenients

  • High interest rates up to 35.99%

Click here to request funds from Viva Payday Loans >

2. Heart Paydays – Best for No Disclaimer Payday Loans Only for Direct Lenders

700xall-(3)Projector wire

Borrowers with bad FICO scores or no credit history can apply for the best online payday loans for bad credit through the Heart Paydays portal and still stand a chance of getting the money they need if they are currently in an excellent financial situation. When using this loan finder service, borrowers are tempted to be matched with direct no-disclaimer lenders only who are most likely to view their financial situation favorably. Loan amounts range from $100 to $5,000 with APRs of 5.99% to 35.99% and 2 to 24 months to pay off.

Advantages

  • Simple eligibility requirements
  • Almost instantaneous request feedback in 2 minutes
  • Flexible repayment terms

The inconvenients

3. Credit Clock – Best Online Payday Loans for Fast Approval Process

700xall-(1)Projector wire

When the best online payday loans are needed in a hurry, time seems to fly without giving you a second to catch your breath. This is where Credit Clock comes to the rescue with lenders that offer fast approval processes and even faster payments.

Credit Clock connects borrowers and lenders with the click of a button. Lenders through Credit Clock offer borrowers affordable loan amounts from $100 to $5,000 for 2 to 24 months. Interest rates range from 5.99% to 35.99%, which may seem high but may be worth the convenience, fast loan approvals and quick repayments. Check if you meet the loan criteria above and apply today!

Advantages

  • Fast payments
  • The easy online application process
  • Affordable Loans

The inconvenients

  • Interest rate up to 35.99%

4. Money Lender Squad – Best for $255 Same Day Online Payday Loans

700xall-(2)Projector wire

Money Lender Squad gives borrowers direct access to lenders without the usual hassle of traditional financial institutions. Their loan finder service helps borrowers apply for the best direct online payday loans online with a single application.

The process is simple and requires borrowers to enter their details, choose their loan amount and repayment period, and the best payday loans online appear in minutes. Online payday loans through lenders on the Money Lender Squad portal range from $100 to $5,000 with APRs of 5.99% to 35.99% and 2 to 24 months to pay off!

Advantages

  • The fast online application process
  • Offers $255 payday loans online and same day deposit
  • Loan amounts up to $5,000

The inconvenients

  • Not all requests are guaranteed to be approved

5. Very Merry Loans – Best Online Payday Loans with Same Day Deposit

700xall-(5)Projector wire

If you don’t need a large loan, the best online payday loans are available through the Very Merry Loans portal lenders. Loan amounts are kept small to keep them affordable, and APRs typically range from 5.99% to 35.99%. Additionally, lenders on the Very Merry Loans platform are known to pay on the same day as loan approval, giving borrowers access to seemingly instant cash. If you meet the general loan criteria mentioned above, you can easily apply for some of the best payday loans online through lenders on the Very Merry Loans platform.

Advantages

  • Same day payments
  • Flexible loan terms
  • Quick online application in 2 minutes

The inconvenients

  • Loan amounts capped at $2,000

Best Online Payday Loans Same Day Features and Considerations

Credit checks

Most online payday loans through US-based lenders are subject to credit checking by law. No credit check, instant approval. However, if you have a bad FICO score but your financial situation has improved, you can still apply online for the best payday loans.

Affordability

Affordability is key when applying for the best payday loans online. When processing your application, lenders will do an affordability check, such as comparing your bank account to expenses and pay stubs.

Penalties

Your loan agreement will specify the penalties and fees associated with your loans. Therefore, it is best to familiarize yourself with the terms of the loan agreement to avoid paying early or late repayment fees.

Conclusion

Online payday loans are an excellent form of financing for those who need funds quickly. They give you the flexibility you need between now and your next payday if you find yourself in a difficult financial situation.

FAQs

What are the best and easiest payday loans to get same day?

Online payday loans are fast, simple and convenient. First, borrowers complete a simple online application that connects them to a panel of lenders. From there, lenders assess the borrower’s affordability and, if they can afford the loan, funds are usually disbursed the same day.

What is the highest payday loan to get?

Online payday lenders offer loans between $100 and $5,000. Depending on the lender, APRs can range from 5.99% to 35.99% with the providers mentioned above. However, most lenders offer flexible repayment terms of 2-12 months or 2-24 months.

What are the best online payday loans?

Borrowers asking about the best payday loans online can use a range of loan search platforms such as Viva Payday Loans to find the best loan for them. Loan finder services simultaneously connect the borrower to a wide range of lenders. This means they are more likely to get a loan because multiple lenders have assessed their applications.

Disclaimer – The above content is not editorial, and Economic Times hereby disclaims all warranties, express or implied, in connection therewith, and does not necessarily warrant, guarantee or endorse any content. The loan websites reviewed are loan matching services, not direct lenders. Therefore, they are not directly involved in the acceptance of your loan application. Applying for a loan with the websites does not guarantee acceptance of a loan. This article does not provide financial advice. Please seek the assistance of a financial advisor if you need financial assistance. Loans available only to US residents.

]]>
How to get out of payday loan debt in Colorado https://nypdholyname.com/how-to-get-out-of-payday-loan-debt-in-colorado/ Tue, 31 May 2022 23:21:48 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/how-to-get-out-of-payday-loan-debt-in-colorado/ Despite all the pros and cons, payday loans are still the most convenient option for meeting immediate cash needs. Payday loans can cost you a lot more in the long run than you originally planned to borrow. Payday loans can quickly become a trap for borrowers due to their high interest rates and fees. The […]]]>

Despite all the pros and cons, payday loans are still the most convenient option for meeting immediate cash needs. Payday loans can cost you a lot more in the long run than you originally planned to borrow.

Payday loans can quickly become a trap for borrowers due to their high interest rates and fees. The bill is coming due and they take out another business loan with even more fees because they can’t pay it. Many predatory lenders abandon their customers using deception and trick consumers into approving loans in states where payday loans are illegal.

Below are some of the key facts about Colorado payday loan laws to help you make an informed decision about payday loans. Also, I will discuss how to get out of living payday loans in Colorado.

5 Important Colorado Payday Loan Laws You Should Know

1. In Colorado, payday loans are legal cheaper.

2. The maximum amount that can be borrowed through payday loans in Colorado is $500. One or more payday loans can be used to meet the $500 limit. Although payday loans in Colorado do not have a maximum term, they have a minimum term of six months.

3. Payday lenders can charge up to 20% of the loan amount in finance fees for amounts up to $300. For every $100 above the first $300 borrowed, lenders can charge up to $7.50 in addition to standard financing fees. The law allows lenders to charge a 45% interest rate if a borrower renews a payday loan.

4. The law allows repayment plans. However, the terms of these plans may differ between lenders as long as they are legal.

5. Collection of unpaid debts is restricted under Colorado payday loan laws. For “insufficient funds” penalties, lenders can charge up to $25. Lenders can sue borrowers for unpaid payday loans for the full amount of the loan plus attorney’s fees. Borrowers can only be sued if they have closed their current accounts before repaying the loan or debt in full.

Lenders are required to issue refunds for the prorated amount of APR when borrowers repay payday loans in full before the end of the APR loan term.

5 Ways to Get a Payday Loan Solution in Colorado

You need to pay off your debts as soon as possible because these loans come with higher interest rates that accrue until you pay off the debts. Usually, you have to pay the debt when you get your next paycheck, but lenders allow you 30-day payment extensions.

It can seem impossible to get out of a payday loan when you have one. Fear not, there are ways to get the payday loan debt solution and get back on your feet. The sooner you can pay off a payday loan, the better.

Here are some of the ways to escape the clutches of a payday lender:

1. Make full payment

It is advisable to repay your entire loan. This is undoubtedly the best way to eliminate your debt. Most lenders also prefer it. With the help of a well-planned budget, you can afford it. When you make your payments in full, you don’t have to worry about incurring additional debt.

Some states won’t allow you to get a new payday loan unless the previous one has been paid off. Once you have made the full payment, you can make sure to improve your financial health.

2. Opt for an extended payment plan

You can work out an Extended Payment Plan (EPP) with your payday lender. This will allow you to repay the loan in smaller installments over a longer period without incurring additional fees or interest.

Review your finances and determine the largest amount you can quickly pay for your loan each month before speaking with your lender. Make an appointment with your lender to discuss your loan restructuring before the last business day before your loan is due.

If you need to sign a new loan contract for your PEP, study the terms carefully before signing. This way you will avoid unpleasant surprises along the way.

Remember that not all payday lenders will participate in a PEP. However, it’s always good to find out about your lender’s flexibility if you can’t afford to repay your loan on time.

3. Consolidate your payday loans

Why should you consider a payday loan consolidation to pay off your predatory debts?

Usually, when there is a high interest rate, all of your monthly payments go towards paying the interest rate payments. Interest payments are the minimum monthly payments you must make. So, if the minimum monthly payment is high, you are not aware of making further payments. Your principal remains intact and your payday loans remain the same. Therefore, lowering the interest rate through negotiations will help you pay off your debts quickly.

You can also avoid collection agents because the payday loan consolidation company will deal with your creditors. Thus, you can lower the interest rate on your payday loans to make full repayments on them; you can also make one-time monthly payments to pay online.

Various companies offer such services. However, not all of these companies are legit. Contact a reputable debt consolidation company to enroll in a consolidation program.

4. Settle your debts

Debt settlement allows you to get out of your debt situation. It will serve as a proposition to your creditors that you are unable to repay your debts in full and therefore only wish to repay part of your total debt. Most lenders and financial institutions will refuse to enter into a settlement agreement with you and will discuss the lump sum you will offer. However, if you reach a reasonable settlement agreement, all you will see is profit!

The first step is to approach your creditors and lenders on your own and ask them to reduce your overall principal amount to a discounted lump sum. The second step is to locate a reputable debt settlement company or law firm and hire them to complete the task. Following the second path will increase your chances of success. Working out a settlement agreement on your own is a difficult task.

5. Consider taking out an alternative payday loan

Consider getting an alternative payday loan (PAL) if you belong to a credit union. The National Credit Union Administration allows federal credit unions to provide members with loans ranging from $200 to $1,000. When applying for PAL, the credit union may only charge an application fee of up to $20 to cover the actual costs of processing the application. The borrower must have been a member of a caisse for at least one month.

Getting a PAL can be a great way to pay off a payday loan and get out of high interest rates. The term of these loans usually ranges from one to six months. For six months, the same borrower can receive up to three PAL.

Can you file for bankruptcy to get out of payday loan debt?

Bankruptcy should always be a choice of last resort. Filing for bankruptcy has many long-term consequences that will hurt your credit for years. This is why it is essential to evaluate all other possibilities before embarking on this path. If you have too many obligations and not enough money to pay them off, bankruptcy may be possible. Payday loans and your other debts could be erased in a bankruptcy filing.

Tips

You should avoid going into debt again. Payday loans are dangerous. Make an effort to increase your income and avoid living paycheck to paycheck. Payday loans are never a long-term answer to your financial needs, but they can definitely hurt your financial situation. Also, many illegal payday lenders use your bank account details for theft and other illegal actions. I hope you will agree that payday loans should be avoided at all costs. Manage your money better for a secure financial life.

Lyle Solomon has extensive legal experience as well as in-depth knowledge and experience in consumer credit and drafting. He has been a member of the California State Bar since 2003. He graduated from the McGeorge School of Law at the University of the Pacific in Sacramento, California in 1998, and currently works for the Oak View Legal Group in California as a senior attorney.

]]>
Propelled by (formerly) huge gains from real estate, stocks, cryptos, while “real” incomes are lagging behind? “Real” consumer spending increases, service spending increases https://nypdholyname.com/propelled-by-formerly-huge-gains-from-real-estate-stocks-cryptos-while-real-incomes-are-lagging-behind-real-consumer-spending-increases-service-spending-increases/ Fri, 27 May 2022 23:34:14 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/propelled-by-formerly-huge-gains-from-real-estate-stocks-cryptos-while-real-incomes-are-lagging-behind-real-consumer-spending-increases-service-spending-increases/ You can see why some retail stocks don’t like the shift from goods to services. By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET. Americans far outpaced inflation in April. “Real” spending on goods – what consumers buy at retailers, adjusted for inflation – rose during the month, but was down from last year’s miracle-stimulus peak. “Real” spending […]]]>

You can see why some retail stocks don’t like the shift from goods to services.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

Americans far outpaced inflation in April. “Real” spending on goods – what consumers buy at retailers, adjusted for inflation – rose during the month, but was down from last year’s miracle-stimulus peak. “Real” spending on services (such as healthcare, travel, entertainment, etc., adjusted for inflation) has surged, after collapsing during the pandemic, as the shift in spending from goods towards services continues, a sign that the distorted recovery – the economy is normalizing. Spending on services is the most important, accounting for more than 60% of total consumer spending.

“Real” spending has increased, approaching the pre-pandemic trend.

Inflation-adjusted spending on goods and services jumped 0.7% in April from March, to a new record high, and rose 2.8% from April’s stimulus miracle. year, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis today. It is now approaching the pre-pandemic trend as the consumer economy normalizes to pre-pandemic growth rates, all adjusted for inflation:

“Real” spending on services has jumped, but there is still a long way to go.

Inflation-adjusted spending on services – health care, housing, education, airfare, lodging, rental cars, sporting and entertainment events, haircuts, repairs, etc. – jumped 0.5% in April from March and 5.9% year-on-year. year.

Actual spending on services eventually exceeded pre-pandemic levels and set a new record, after spending on discretionary services collapsed during the pandemic (such as airline tickets, discretionary health services, such as dentists and elective surgery, haircuts, etc.). It remains well below the pre-pandemic trend (green line), but is on the way to normalizing, with spending shifting from goods to services.

This surge in “real” spending on services over the past few months (+5.9% y/y) is what has boosted consumer spending, even as spending on goods has fallen from the crisis-fueled peaks. relaunched a year ago.

Spending on services is important: in April, it represented 61.4% of total consumer spending, but it is still down from the pre-pandemic average of more than 64%. This is an indication that spending on services, as it normalizes, will continue to grow at a disproportionate rate (so watch out for services CPI inflation, which is starting to eat away at everyone).

Real spending on non-durable goods is slowly normalizing to nosebleed levels.

Inflation-adjusted spending on non-durable goods – dominated by food, fuel and household supplies – edged up 0.2% for the month, but fell 0.5% from the stimulus peak -April miracle a year ago.

Even after the year-over-year decline, consumer spending on non-durable goods remains at nosebleed levels, up 12% from April 2019, and well above the pre-trend. -pandemic (green line). But it is gradually normalizing and returning to the pre-pandemic trend:

Real Spending on Durable Goods Suddenly Jumps Month Over Month.

So just to create another surprise about “exploited” US consumers or whatever, inflation-adjusted spending on durable goods jumped 2.3% for the month, just when you thought consumers had bought everything they needed, and were going to back off.

Compared to April’s miracle stimulus peak of last year, real spending on durable goods has fallen 6.5%. Spending remains at nosebleed levels, up 29% from April 2019, and continues to contribute to shortages and price spikes in some of these products, as well as the massive trade deficit, as many of these products are manufactured in other countries or contain components that are manufactured in other countries.

But you can see the uneven normalization, the regression to the pre-pandemic mean:

“Real” income below pre-pandemic trend.

Personal income adjusted for inflation from all sources fell 3.5% from April a year ago, when stimulus money was still coming in, but rose slightly from March (purple). This includes income from wages and salaries, dividends, interest, rentals, farms, businesses, and government transfer payments (stimulus, social security, unemployment, welfare, etc.), but does not include not capital gains. Late last year, as inflation rose, real income fell below the pre-pandemic trend and stayed there. It only increased by 6.0% compared to April 2019.

Inflation adjusted income without transfer payments rose 2.0% from a year ago and 0.3% in April from March (red line). It fell below the pre-pandemic trend at the start of the pandemic. After a partial recovery, it has lost further ground since the end of last year due to the surge in inflation and has remained essentially flat since November.

“Real” disposable income per capita looks worse.

The income data above was for aggregate income, for all consumers combined, where income growth is also fueled by rising employment and population growth.

Here is the level of “real” disposable income per capita – that is, after-tax per capita income from all sources, which was flat for the month and down 6.4% from a year ago. year, and up a tiny 1.8% from April 2019. And that’s well below pre-pandemic trends:

The substantial increase in inflation-adjusted spending and the bleak picture of inflation-adjusted income (which does not include capital gains) show that consumers – not all but enough to move the needle – are still flush with the funds of the gazillion stimulus programs and with the money they can extract from soaring house, stock and crypto prices, where consumers have earned trillions of dollars in total, some of which have already been spent, and some of which have disappeared in recent sales, and some of which they still sit on and will continue to spend.

But consumer borrowing to spend, well… not so hot.

Not adjusted for inflation: Credit card balances, excluding other revolving loans such as personal loans, fell to $840 billion in the first quarter, compared to the fourth quarter, still below the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2019, and back to where they were in the first quarter of 2008, despite 13 years of population growth and 37% CPI inflation (red line).

Other consumer loans, such as personal loans and payday loans, at $450 billion, were also below pre-financial crisis highs, despite 13 years of population growth and 37% inflation. CPI (green line).

For my in-depth discussion of consumer borrowing across all categories, delinquencies, foreclosures, third-party collections, and bankruptcies, read… Consumers Can Handle Fed Tightening: Their Debts, Delinquencies, Foreclosures, Collections and bankruptcies

Do you like to read WOLF STREET and want to support it? You use ad blockers – I completely understand why – but you want to support the site? You can donate. I greatly appreciate it. Click on the mug of beer and iced tea to find out how:

Would you like to be notified by e-mail when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Register here.

]]>
Online Payday Loans: Market by 2028 | Business Strategy Analysis, Trader and Key Players https://nypdholyname.com/online-payday-loans-market-by-2028-business-strategy-analysis-trader-and-key-players/ Mon, 23 May 2022 15:17:00 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/online-payday-loans-market-by-2028-business-strategy-analysis-trader-and-key-players/ Online Payday Loans Market 2022 This research report offers Impact of recent market disruptions such as the Russian-Ukrainian war and the COVID-19 outbreak study accumulated to offer the latest information about the acute characteristics of the Online Payday Loans Market. This intelligence report includes investigations based on Current scenarios, historical records and future predictions. The […]]]>

Online Payday Loans Market 2022 This research report offers Impact of recent market disruptions such as the Russian-Ukrainian war and the COVID-19 outbreak study accumulated to offer the latest information about the acute characteristics of the Online Payday Loans Market. This intelligence report includes investigations based on Current scenarios, historical records and future predictions. The report contains different market forecasts related to the market size, revenue, production, CAGR, consumption, gross margin, charts, graphs, pie charts, price, and other important factors. While emphasizing the major driving and restraining forces of this market, the report also offers a comprehensive study of the future market trends and developments. It also examines the role of major market players involved in the industry including their company overview, financial summary and SWOT analysis. He presents the 360 degrees overview of the industries competitive landscape. The online payday loan market is stable growth and CAGR is expected to improve over the forecast period.
Key players included in the Online Payday Loans research report include-

Payday advance
MEM Consumer Financing
wonga
Instant Cash Loans
Cash America International
DFC Global Corp
Network 2345

The sample pages are a PDF document covering the detailed table of contents as well as the outline of charts, graphs, figures and tables to give you an idea of ​​the final report. Please note that sample pages may not contain actual numbers.

In view of the ongoing pandemic, our analysts have carefully reviewed and presented the parameters below under the Detailed analysis of the impact of Covid – 19 in the Online Payday Loans research report:

Analysis of the overall impact of Covid – 19 on the world which will include quantitative data in which we will include the estimated deviation in market size (negative or positive) due to the pandemic.

  • End-user trend, preferences and budget impact

Qualitative data on end-user segment trends due to enforced policies and security guidelines are analyzed in the Online Payday Loans research report. Additionally, a detailed understanding of end-of-consumption preferences as to what type/technology the end-user adopts is also explored in the report. The additional funding provided by the legal authorities also included providing information on a particular vertical industry to boost economic development.

  • Regulatory Framework/Government Policies

Detailed qualitative analyzes on government policies and security guidelines followed by each country are studied to understand the views and opinions of the different authorities used to regulate the impact caused by Covid-19.

  • Strategy of key actors to fight against negative impacts

The overall business strategies adopted by key companies in Covid – 19 situations are analyzed and documented in our research studies. The information is presented in qualitative or quantitative form in the Online Payday Loans research report.

The opportunities that Covid – 19 Presents Online Payday Loan Players and industry professionals are mentioned to give a detailed understanding of the next best possible cost-effective solutions.

The years studied to estimate the market size of Online Payday Loans are as follows:

Historical year: 2015-2019
Reference year: 2020
Estimated year: 2021
Forecast year: 2022-2026

The Online Payday Loans research report also encompasses terms that impact the industry. It also includes growth drivers and challenges faced by the online payday loans industry. The research report includes detailed segmentation analysis along with several sub-segments.

Online Personal Loans Segmentation –

On the basis of types, the online payday loans market from 2015 to 2025 is majorly split into:
Payment
single phase

based on records, the online personal loan market from 2015 to 2025 covers:
Staff
Big business
SME

Regional Online Payday Loans Market Analysis:

It could be divided into two different sections: one for regional production analysis and the other for regional consumption analysis. Here, analysts share gross margin, price, revenue, production, CAGR, and other factors that indicate growth for all regional markets studied in the report. covering

Region Countries
North America United States and Canada
Europe United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Hungary, BENELUX, NORDIC, Rest of Europe
Asia Pacific China, India, Japan, South Korea

Australia, New Zealand, Rest of Asia-Pacific

Latin America Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of Latin America
Middle East and Africa Israel, GCC, South Africa, Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • Increase in per capita disposable income
  • Youth friendly Demographics
  • Technological advancement

20% free personalization – If you would like us to cover the analysis of a particular geography or segmentation that is not part of the scope, please let us know here so that we can customize the report for you.

Main points covered in the table of contents:

  • Insight: Along with a broad overview of the global Online Payday Loans market, this section provides an overview of the report to give an idea of ​​the nature and content of the research study.
  • Analysis of the strategies of the main players: Market players can use this analysis to gain a competitive advantage over their rivals in the online payday loans market.
  • Study on the main market trends: This section of the report offers a deeper analysis of recent and future market trends.
  • Market Forecast: Buyers of the report will have access to accurate and validated estimates of the total market size in terms of value and volume. The report also provides consumption, production, sales and other forecasts for the Online Payday Loans market.
  • Regional Growth Analysis: All major regions and countries have been covered Online Payday Loans Market report. The regional analysis will help market players to tap into unexplored regional markets, prepare specific strategies for target regions, and compare the growth of all regional markets.
  • Sector analysis: The report provides accurate and reliable forecasts of the market share of important segments of the online payday loans market. Market players can use this analysis to make strategic investments in key growth pockets of the Online Payday Loans Market.

Key questions answered by the report –

  • Who are the Global Online Payday Loans Industry Players and What is their Market Share, Net Worth, Sales, Competitive Landscape, SWOT Analysis and Post Covid-19 Strategies?
  • What are the main drivers, growth/decline factors and pain points of online payday loans?
  • How is the online payday loan industry expected to emerge during the pandemic and during the forecast period of 2022 to 2026?
  • What are the offering models in the different regions mentioned in the Online Payday Loans Research Report?
  • Has there been any change in the regulatory policy framework after the Covid-19 situations?
  • What are the major application areas and product types that are going to expect an increase in demand during the forecast period 2022 – 2026?

(*If you have special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report you want.)

Note – In order to provide more accurate market forecasts, all our reports will be updated prior to delivery considering the impact of COVID-19.

Contact us:
The Web: www.qurateresearch.com
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: USA – +13393375221, IN – +919881074592

]]>
Borrowing money through apps – is it possible? https://nypdholyname.com/borrowing-money-through-apps-is-it-possible/ Fri, 20 May 2022 18:39:10 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/borrowing-money-through-apps-is-it-possible/ New York, USA, May 20, 2022, ZEXPRWIRE, It can be difficult to find a place to get some quick cash before your next payday, but there are some solutions applicants can use. One of the places where most people can get a quick fix is ​​to take out a loan from an app. This method […]]]>

New York, USA, May 20, 2022, ZEXPRWIRE, It can be difficult to find a place to get some quick cash before your next payday, but there are some solutions applicants can use. One of the places where most people can get a quick fix is ​​to take out a loan from an app. This method of borrowing is different from personal loans or credit cards. This is because the cost of borrowing is not expressed as an interest rate and it is one of the cheapest sources of credit for anyone who needs to borrow funds. With so many applications offering loans, applicants have enough choice. According to UstatesReadya key tip is that any applicant should read reviews and ensure that you are borrowing from a reputable loan application.

Why loan apps have become popular

Here are some of the some reasons why borrowing through apps has become popular. Keep in mind there could be more – if you know about it let us know, we’d love to hear from the public why loan applications have become more popular.

1.No need for physical documentation

Whenever an applicant makes the decision to borrow from an online application, no documents are required. This is not the case when an applicant can visit a bank or any lender that has a physical office. If requested for documents, the applicant will have the option to upload the photos of these documents in the application. This is one of the reasons why their processing times are much shorter.

2. Easy application process

The applications offer loans to eligible applicants in a smooth and hassle-free process. All the applicant has to do is download the application, create an account and provide the required personal information. The applicant will then upload the necessary documentation and their loan will be approved. It’s a very simple and easy process, designed to make it much more efficient than in person. As soon as the loan is approved, the applicant will receive a notification message.

3. Faster Processing

Traditional lenders take time to process loan applications. It is common for an applicant’s loan application to take longer than a month. However, this has changed since the introduction of mobile app loans. The average loan approval time is in minutes, and if it’s late, it’s no more than hours. Borrowers will no longer have to wait days or weeks for much-needed money.

4. Flexibility in the amount borrowed

Depending on whether an applicant qualifies or not, loan applicants may request varying amounts. The loans are arranged in brackets and the amount borrowed depends on the eligibility. If an applicant qualifies for more, the applicant will be free to borrow a higher amount, and vice versa.

5. Permanent accessibility

Regardless of the time of day, any loan seeker can access these loans. There are no restrictions on application times. Loan seekers can still submit their application even in the middle of the night when no one is working.

6. Convenience

App loans can be considered convenient in different ways. The apps are compatible with all available smartphones, which means that any applicant’s loan advance can be approved even when they are resting on their couch! It’s important not to be too complacent to make sure there are no mistakes. Also, the whole process is short and clear, and takes little effort or time, which is an added advantage for loan applications.

Conclusion

Mobile app loans have removed the cumbersome and tedious loan application process that is normally associated with traditional lenders. The above reasons explain why mobile app loans have become very attractive to applicants. The lower interest rate is another factor that has made mobile app loans attractive.

]]>
Online Payday Loans: 2022 Latest Emerging Market Trend, Demand, Customer Needs and 2028 Forecast with Key Players https://nypdholyname.com/online-payday-loans-2022-latest-emerging-market-trend-demand-customer-needs-and-2028-forecast-with-key-players/ Tue, 10 May 2022 11:34:19 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/online-payday-loans-2022-latest-emerging-market-trend-demand-customer-needs-and-2028-forecast-with-key-players/ Online Payday Loans Market 2022 This research report offers Impact of recent market disruptions such as the Russian-Ukrainian war and the COVID-19 outbreak study accumulated to offer the latest information about the acute characteristics of the Online Payday Loans Market. This intelligence report includes investigations based on Current scenarios, historical records and future predictions. The […]]]>

Online Payday Loans Market 2022 This research report offers Impact of recent market disruptions such as the Russian-Ukrainian war and the COVID-19 outbreak study accumulated to offer the latest information about the acute characteristics of the Online Payday Loans Market. This intelligence report includes investigations based on Current scenarios, historical records and future predictions. The report contains different market forecasts related to the market size, revenue, production, CAGR, consumption, gross margin, charts, graphs, pie charts, price, and other important factors. While emphasizing the major driving and restraining forces of this market, the report also offers a comprehensive study of the future market trends and developments. It also examines the role of major market players involved in the industry including their company overview, financial summary and SWOT analysis. He presents the 360 degrees overview of the industries competitive landscape. The online payday loan market is stable growth and CAGR is expected to improve over the forecast period.
Key players included in the Online Payday Loans research report include-

Payday advance
MEM Consumer Financing
wonga
Instant Cash Loans
Cash America International
DFC Global Corp
Network 2345

The sample pages are a PDF document covering the detailed table of contents as well as the outline of charts, graphs, figures and tables to give you an idea of ​​the final report. Please note that sample pages may not contain actual numbers.

In view of the ongoing pandemic, our analysts have carefully reviewed and presented the metrics below under the Detailed analysis of the impact of Covid – 19 in the Online Payday Loans research report:

Analysis of the overall impact of Covid – 19 on the world which will include quantitative data in which we will include the estimated deviation in market size (negative or positive) due to the pandemic.

  • End-user trend, preferences and budget impact

Qualitative data on end-user segment trends due to enforced policies and security guidelines are analyzed in the Online Payday Loans research report. Additionally, a detailed understanding of end-of-consumption preferences as to what type/technology the end-user adopts is also explored in the report. The additional funding provided by the legal authorities also included providing information on a particular vertical industry to boost economic development.

  • Regulatory Framework/Government Policies

Detailed qualitative analyzes on government policies and security guidelines followed by each country are studied to understand the views and opinions of the different authorities used to regulate the impact caused by Covid-19.

  • Strategy of key actors to fight against negative impacts

The overall business strategies adopted by key companies in Covid – 19 situations are analyzed and documented in our research studies. The information is presented in qualitative or quantitative form in the Online Payday Loans research report.

The opportunities that Covid – 19 Presents to Online Payday Loan Stakeholders and industry professionals are mentioned to give a detailed understanding of the next best possible cost-effective solutions.

The years studied to estimate the market size of Online Payday Loans are as follows:

Historical year: 2015-2019
Reference year: 2020
Estimated year: 2021
Forecast year: 2022-2026

The Online Payday Loans research report also encompasses terms that impact the industry. It also includes growth drivers and challenges faced by the online payday loans industry. The research report includes detailed segmentation analysis along with several sub-segments.

Online Personal Loans Segmentation –

On the basis of types, the online payday loans market from 2015 to 2025 is majorly split into:
Payment
single phase

based on records, the Online Personal Loan market from 2015 to 2025 covers:
Staff
Big business
SME

Regional Online Payday Loans Market Analysis:

It could be divided into two different sections: one for regional production analysis and the other for regional consumption analysis. Here, analysts share gross margin, price, revenue, production, CAGR, and other factors that indicate growth for all regional markets studied in the report. covering

Region Countries
North America United States and Canada
Europe UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Hungary, BENELUX, NORDIC, Rest of Europe
Asia Pacific China, India, Japan, South Korea

Australia, New Zealand, Rest of Asia-Pacific

Latin America Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of Latin America
Middle East and Africa Israel, GCC, South Africa, Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • Increase in per capita disposable income
  • Youth friendly Demographics
  • Technological advancement

20% free personalization – If you would like us to cover the analysis of a particular geography or segmentation that is not part of the scope, please let us know here so that we can customize the report for you.

Main points covered in the table of contents:

  • Insight: Along with a broad overview of the global Online Payday Loans market, this section provides an overview of the report to give an idea of ​​the nature and content of the research study.
  • Analysis of the strategies of the main players: Market players can use this analysis to gain a competitive advantage over their rivals in the online payday loans market.
  • Study on the main market trends: This section of the report offers a deeper analysis of recent and future market trends.
  • Market Forecast: Buyers of the report will have access to accurate and validated estimates of the total market size in terms of value and volume. The report also provides consumption, production, sales and other forecasts for the Online Payday Loans market.
  • Regional Growth Analysis: All major regions and countries have been covered Online Payday Loans Market Report. The regional analysis will help market players to tap into unexplored regional markets, prepare specific strategies for target regions, and compare the growth of all regional markets.
  • Sector analysis: The report provides accurate and reliable forecasts of the market share of important segments of the online payday loans market. Market players can use this analysis to make strategic investments in key growth pockets of the Online Payday Loans Market.

Key questions answered by the report –

  • Who are the Global Online Payday Loans Industry Players and What is their Market Share, Net Worth, Sales, Competitive Landscape, SWOT Analysis and Post Covid-19 Strategies?
  • What are the main drivers, growth/decline factors and pain points of online payday loans?
  • How is the online payday loan industry expected to emerge during the pandemic and during the forecast period of 2022 to 2026?
  • What are the offering models in the different regions mentioned in the Online Payday Loans Research Report?
  • Has there been any change in the regulatory policy framework after the Covid-19 situations?
  • What are the major application areas and product types that are going to expect an increase in demand during the forecast period 2022 – 2026?

(*If you have special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report you want.)

Note – In order to provide more accurate market forecasts, all our reports will be updated prior to delivery considering the impact of COVID-19.

Contact us:
The Web: www.qurateresearch.com
Email: sales@qurateresearch.com
Telephone: USA – +13393375221, IN – +919881074592

]]>
Mother awaiting heart transplant shares her story https://nypdholyname.com/mother-awaiting-heart-transplant-shares-her-story/ Sun, 08 May 2022 09:01:17 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/mother-awaiting-heart-transplant-shares-her-story/ Share on PinterestAfter giving birth to her second child, Zuleyma Santos was diagnosed with a rare form of heart failure and placed on the waiting list for a heart transplant. Photograph courtesy of Padilla Co Mother of two, Zuleyma Santos, works with the American Heart Association to raise awareness of the dangers of heart disease […]]]>

Share on Pinterest
After giving birth to her second child, Zuleyma Santos was diagnosed with a rare form of heart failure and placed on the waiting list for a heart transplant. Photograph courtesy of Padilla Co

Mother of two, Zuleyma Santos, works with the American Heart Association to raise awareness of the dangers of heart disease in young adults.

On paper, one would think Zuleyma Santosnow 37 years old, had it all.

Two new children born in as many years. A retail career she loved. A devoted and loving husband who, despite cancer, was always there for her and a huge, close and supportive family.

This should have been the time of his life.

But within those events came a blockbuster: Santos developed a rare and often fatal heart condition caused by the pregnancy.

That’s why today, she smiles as she adjusts the still-there backpack on her shoulder that holds 10 pounds of batteries, constantly working to keep the device that keeps her heart going while she waits for a heart transplant.

Although there were signs – and a diagnosis – after the birth of her second child in 2019, no one understood the gravity of the situation, and Santos, immersed in the beginning of his life as a parent and concentrating on her husband’s cancer treatments, did not push.

“I think there were symptoms that went unaddressed,” she told Healthline. “I have always been a strong person. You will never hear me say “oh it hurts”. It is not me.

This “go for it” attitude could have proved fatal with the birth of her second child.

But it also propelled her into a space she never thought she would be in – spokesperson for the American Heart Association.

“I felt I needed a way to reach people. To help them know how to speak for themselves.

“I never thought I would have heart failure or my partner would have cancer, at least not when our kids are babies with dirty nappies lying between my hospital bed. But I’m here. And if I can be the voice they hear – knowing there are resources out there – then so be it.

Santos was holding her then two-day-old baby in the hospital when suddenly she could barely breathe.

“I called the nurse and said ‘hold baby, something’s wrong with me!” she remembered. “I couldn’t breathe and thought I was losing my life.”

She was examined, tested, and then diagnosed. It was peripartum cardiomyopathy, they told her, a form of heart failure that occurs in the last month of pregnancy or the first few months after giving birth.

The baby went home, but Santos remained in the hospital for four more days. She was stabilized and told to rest and see a follow-up cardiologist once home.

She did, but as at every cardiology visit she was told that she had passed all the exams and that she had been given medication that stabilized her, she made a decision.

“It was time to get back to normal life,” she said. “I was like ‘I feel fine. Why are you telling me I have this? So I went back to my life: working, taking care of the kids and taking care of my husband.

No one blinked or tried to steer her in another direction, she said.

In March, the pandemic shutdown hit, a “blessing”, she said, because although it was hard to lose her job, it was great to be “home and s ‘taking care of the children’ while her husband returned to the hospital to fight his cancer. As stressful as it may seem, she said, she felt good at home and confident in her health.

Then summer came. In July, she was struggling,

“I felt tired, exhausted and couldn’t eat well,” she said.

But the postpartum heart diagnosis didn’t cross her mind.

“I didn’t really think it was my body,” she said. “I thought it was the summer heat. And you know, taking care of two babies and a husband battling cancer. It’s wreaking havoc. »

Then it got worse. “I couldn’t even lift my daughter’s legs to change a diaper,” she recalls.

She went to the emergency room – in the middle of the pandemic – with swollen legs, nausea and exhaustion. Although she was told of the earlier diagnosis, she said, they sent her home and told her to try eating differently.

Worried, she tried to get in touch with a cardiologist, but the pandemic shutdown also made that difficult. She got an appointment for the end of October and was hoping for the best.

Five days after that ER visit, she suddenly plummeted and realized she was in trouble.

“I told my husband to call an ambulance,” she said.

The last thing she remembers is being intubated. She woke up on November 3 and was told she had stage four heart failure and needed a heart transplant.

“It was very hard to hear,” she said. “I didn’t understand how I, at my age, got to this.”

It’s not an uncommon way for someone his age to think.

“This underscores the importance of recognizing this condition and heart disease in general,” Dr. Eugene DePasqualea cardiologist with USC Keck Medicinewho treats Santos, told Healthline.

“The leading cause of death in the United States [based on data gathered pre-COVID-19] is heart disease,” he said. But when people look [based on their symptoms] they search for ‘cancer,’” he said.

He said the data suggests less than three per cent of people looking for symptoms search online for heart disease.

The media, he said, reports on suicide, terrorist deaths and cancer, but not so much on heart disease.

Also, he said, younger heart patients tend to have different symptoms that are more focused on the gastrointestinal tract.

“Younger patients, in particular, can be missed,” he said of the cardiac diagnosis. “Not only by the patient but by the [medical experts] as well.

That’s why he and his team are thrilled to have her share her story while working on a heart transplant.

“She’s a special woman,” he said. “We are very grateful to him. She’s been through a lot, but she still does things like that. She is part of our family and vice versa.

Santos came home with this backpack loading her HeartMate Pumpwho will do the work of a heart until she receives a transplant.

DePasquale said because Santos developed antibodies during that second pregnancy that spurred heart disease, making her pool of donor hearts very small. The Friday before Mother’s Day, they were supposed to start working on getting those antibodies out of her.

She came home hopeful about it and grateful to be alive, as well as ready to take over from her ailing husband, who had taken care of the children with the help of his family during his recovery. to the hospital.

“I could feel he was waiting for me – clinging to his health to take care of things until I could,” she said.

She was right. She arrived home on December 29. On January 16, they threw a happy third birthday party for their son.

A week later, her husband went to the hospital. On February 27, he was at home in hospice care where he died shortly after.

Still, Santos is grateful and positive.

‘He gave me the strength to do it,’ she said of raising two children as a widow, battling heart disease while waiting for a transplant and being a doorway. -word of heart health.

“He did it for me, and now it’s my turn to do it for him. I’m going to support this family, keep these children happy.

She works hard with her doctors to get the heart transplant and speaks out.

Says DePasquale, she makes a difference in more ways than she realizes.

“We are very grateful to him,” he said. “She helps put this into perspective and encourages others to be proactive and fight for the symptoms to be recognized.”

It also, he said, gave visibility into how heart pumps work. The HeartMate pump has been used by people as high-profile as former Vice President Dick Cheney, he said, but the powerful image of an ordinary woman living with someone could help many.

“It’s not as scary as some people think,” he said. “She can help people to accept that better.”

Santos looks to the future and a new heart with hope.

Doctors told her she probably had signs of heart disease after the birth of her first child. And while that might have meant avoiding some of the extreme diseases, it would have changed something else as well.

“They would have told me not to have any more children,” she said. “I might not have had my daughter. And you know, I wouldn’t change that for the world.

]]>
ELEVATE CREDIT, INC. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Form 10-Q) https://nypdholyname.com/elevate-credit-inc-managements-discussion-and-analysis-of-financial-condition-and-results-of-operations-form-10-q/ Fri, 06 May 2022 16:34:06 +0000 https://nypdholyname.com/elevate-credit-inc-managements-discussion-and-analysis-of-financial-condition-and-results-of-operations-form-10-q/ The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand our business, our results of operations and our financial condition. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related […]]]>
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand our
business, our results of operations and our financial condition. The MD&A is
provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes and
other financial information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.

Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis, including
information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should
review the "Note About Forward-Looking Statements" section of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by
the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and
analysis. We generally refer to loans, customers and other information and data
associated with each of our brands (Rise, Elastic and Today Card) as Elevate's
loans, customers, information and data, irrespective of whether Elevate directly
originates the credit to the customer or whether such credit is originated by a
third party.

OVERVIEW

We provide online credit solutions to consumers in the US who are not
well-served by traditional bank products and who are looking for better options
than payday loans, title loans, pawn and storefront installment loans. Non-prime
consumers now represent a larger market than prime consumers but are riskier to
underwrite and serve with traditional approaches. We're succeeding at it - and
doing it responsibly - with best-in-class advanced technology and proprietary
risk analytics honed by serving more than 2.7 million customers with $10.0
billion in credit. Our current online credit products, Rise, Elastic and Today
Card, reflect our mission to provide customers with access to competitively
priced credit and services while helping them build a brighter financial future
with credit building and financial wellness features. We call this mission "Good
Today, Better Tomorrow."

We earn revenues on the Rise installment loans, on the Rise and Elastic lines of
credit and on the Today Card credit card product. Our revenue primarily consists
of finance charges and line of credit fees. Finance charges are driven by our
average loan balances outstanding and by the average annual percentage rate
("APR") associated with those outstanding loan balances. We calculate our
average loan balances by taking a simple daily average of the ending loan
balances outstanding for each period. Line of credit fees are recognized when
they are assessed and recorded to revenue over the life of the loan. We present
certain key metrics and other information on a "combined" basis to reflect
information related to loans originated by us and by our bank partners that
license our brands, Republic Bank, FinWise Bank and Capital Community Bank
("CCB"), as well as loans originated by third-party lenders pursuant to CSO
programs, which loans originated through CSO programs are not recorded on our
balance sheet in accordance with US GAAP. See "-Key Financial and Operating
Metrics" and "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures."

We use our working capital and our credit facility with Victory Park Management,
LLC ("VPC" and the "VPC Facility") to fund the loans we directly make to our
Rise customers. The VPC Facility has a maximum total borrowing amount available
of $200 million at March 31, 2022.

We also license our Rise installment loan brand to two banks. FinWise Bank
originates Rise installment loans in 17 states. This bank initially provides all
of the funding, retains 4% of the balances of all of the loans originated and
sells the remaining 96% loan participation in those Rise installment loans to a
third-party SPV, EF SPV, Ltd. ("EF SPV"). These loan participation purchases are
funded through a separate financing facility (the "EF SPV Facility"), and
through cash flows from operations generated by EF SPV. The EF SPV Facility has
a maximum total borrowing amount available of $250 million. We do not own EF
SPV, but we have a credit default protection agreement with EF SPV whereby we
provide credit protection to the investors in EF SPV against Rise loan losses in
return for a credit premium. As the primary beneficiary, Elevate is required to
consolidate EF SPV as a variable interest entity ("VIE") under US GAAP and the
condensed consolidated financial statements include revenue, losses and loans
receivable related to the 96% of the Rise installment loans originated by
FinWise Bank and sold to EF SPV.



                                       39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beginning in the third quarter of 2020, we also license our Rise installment
loan brand to an additional bank, CCB, which originates Rise installment loans
in three different states than FinWise Bank. Similar to the relationship with
FinWise Bank, CCB initially provides all of the funding, retains 5% of the
balances of all of the loans originated and sells the remaining 95% loan
participation in those Rise installment loans to a third-party SPV, EC SPV, Ltd.
("EC SPV"). These loan participation purchases are funded through a separate
financing facility (the "EC SPV Facility"), and through cash flows from
operations generated by EC SPV. The EC SPV Facility has a maximum total
borrowing amount available of $100 million. We do not own EC SPV, but we have a
credit default protection agreement with EC SPV whereby we provide credit
protection to the investors in EC SPV against Rise loan losses in return for a
credit premium. As the primary beneficiary, Elevate is required to consolidate
EC SPV as a VIE under US GAAP and the condensed consolidated financial
statements include revenue, losses and loans receivable related to the 95% of
the Rise installment loans originated by CCB and sold to EC SPV.

The Elastic line of credit product is originated by a third-party lender,
Republic Bank, which initially provides all of the funding for that product.
Republic Bank retains 10% of the balances of all loans originated and sells a
90% loan participation in the Elastic lines of credit. An SPV structure was
implemented such that the loan participations are sold by Republic Bank to
Elastic SPV, Ltd. ("Elastic SPV") and Elastic SPV receives its funding from VPC
in a separate financing facility (the "ESPV Facility"), which was finalized on
July 13, 2015. We do not own Elastic SPV, but we have a credit default
protection agreement with Elastic SPV whereby we provide credit protection to
the investors in Elastic SPV against Elastic loan losses in return for a credit
premium. Per the terms of this agreement, under US GAAP, we are the primary
beneficiary of Elastic SPV and are required to consolidate the financial results
of Elastic SPV as a VIE in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The
ESPV Facility has a maximum total borrowing amount available of $350 million at
March 31, 2022.

Today Card is a credit card product designed to meet the spending needs of
non-prime consumers by offering a prime customer experience. Today Card is
originated by CCB under the licensed MasterCard brand, and a 95% participation
interest in the credit card receivable is sold to us. These credit card
receivable purchases are funded through a separate financing facility (the "TSPV
Facility"), and through cash flows from operations generated by the Today Card
portfolio. The TSPV Facility has a maximum commitment amount of $50 million,
which may be increased up to $100 million. As the lowest APR product in our
portfolio, Today Card allows us to serve a broader spectrum of non-prime
Americans. The Today Card experienced significant growth in its portfolio size
despite the pandemic due to the success of our direct mail campaigns, the
primary marketing channel for acquiring new Today Card customers. We are
following a specific growth plan to grow the product while monitoring customer
responses and credit quality. Customer response to the Today Card is very
strong, as we continue to see extremely high response rates, high customer
engagement, and positive customer satisfaction scores.

In January 2022, we collaborated with Central Pacific Bank ("CPB") to invest in
the launch of a new fintech company, Swell Financial, Inc. ("Swell"). The Swell
App includes several groundbreaking features to help customers automatically
control their spending, tackle debt, and invest in exclusive private market
opportunities with as little as $1 thousand. We will help CPB and Swell offer
the Swell Credit line of credit product with APRs between 8% and 24%. Our
current total investment carrying value in Swell, using equity method
accounting, is $5.5 million and we have a non-controlling interest in Swell.

Our management evaluates our financial performance and our future strategic objectives using key indicators based primarily on the following three themes:


•Revenue growth.   Key metrics related to revenue growth that we monitor by
product include the ending and average combined loan balances outstanding, the
effective APR of our product loan portfolios, the total dollar value of loans
originated, the number of new customer loans made, the ending number of customer
loans outstanding and the related customer acquisition costs ("CAC") associated
with each new customer loan made. We include CAC as a key metric when analyzing
revenue growth (rather than as a key metric within margin expansion).

•Stable credit quality.   Since the time they were managing our legacy US
products, our management team has maintained stable credit quality across the
loan portfolio they were managing. Additionally, in the periods covered in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, we have maintained our strong credit quality. With the adoption of
fair value for the loans receivable portfolio effective January 1, 2022, the
credit quality metrics we monitor include net charge-offs as a percentage of
revenues, change in fair value of loans receivable as a percentage of revenues,
the percentage of past due combined loans receivable - principal and net
principal charge-offs as a percentage of average combined loans
receivable-principal. Prior to our adoption of fair value for the loans
receivable portfolio effective January 1, 2022, our credit quality metrics also
included the combined loan loss reserve as a percentage of outstanding combined
loans and total provision for loan losses as a percentage of revenues. Under
fair value accounting, a specific loan loss reserve is no longer required to be
recognized as a credit loss estimate is a key assumption used in measuring fair
value. See "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for further information.



                                       40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

•Margin expansion.   We aim to manage our business to achieve a long-term
operating margin of 20%. In periods of significant loan portfolio growth, our
margins may become compressed due to the upfront costs associated with
marketing. Prior to our adoption of fair value for the loans receivable
portfolio, we incurred upfront credit provisioning expense associated with loan
portfolio growth. When applying fair value accounting, estimated credit loss is
a key assumption within the fair value assumptions used each quarter and
specific loan loss allowance is no longer required to be recognized. As we
continue to rebuild and scale our portfolio from the impacts of COVID-19, we
anticipate that our direct marketing costs primarily associated with new
customer acquisitions will be approximately 10% of revenues and our operating
expenses will decline to 20% of revenues. While our operating margins may exceed
20% in certain years, such as in 2020 when we incurred lower levels of direct
marketing expense and materially lower credit losses due to a lack of customer
demand for loans resulting from the effects of COVID-19, we do not expect our
operating margin to increase beyond that level over the long-term, as we intend
to pass on any improvements over our targeted margins to our customers in the
form of lower APRs. We believe this is a critical component of our responsible
lending platform and over time will also help us continue to attract new
customers and retain existing customers.

Choice of fair value option


Prior to January 1, 2022, we carried our combined loans receivable portfolio at
amortized cost, net of an allowance for estimated loan losses inherent in the
combined loan portfolio. Effective January 1, 2022, we elected the fair value
option to account for all our combined loan portfolio in conjunction with our
early adoption of Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU
2016-13") and the related amendments. We believe the election of the fair value
option better reflects the value of our portfolio and its future economic
performance as well as more closely aligns with our decision-making processes
that relies on unit economics that align with discounted cash flow methodologies
that are utilized in fair value accounting. Refer to Note 1 for discussion of
the election and its impact on our accounting policies.

In accordance with the transition guidance, on January 1, 2022, we released the
allowance for loan losses and measured the combined loans receivable at fair
value at adoption. The cumulative-effect adjustment, net of tax, was recognized
collectively as a net increase of $98.6 million to opening Retained earnings.

In comparing our current period results under the fair value option to prior
periods, it may be helpful to consider that loans receivable are carried at fair
value with changes in fair value of loans receivable recorded in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value takes into consideration
expected lifetime losses of the loans receivable, whereas the prior method
incorporated only incurred losses recognized as an allowance for loan losses. As
such, changes in credit quality, amongst other significant assumptions,
typically have a more significant impact on the carrying value of the combined
loans receivable portfolio under the fair value option. See "-Non-GAAP Financial
Measures" for further information.

Impact of COVID-19


The COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictive measures taken by governments,
businesses and individuals caused unprecedented uncertainty, volatility and
disruption in financial markets and in governmental, commercial and consumer
activity in the United States, including the markets that we serve. As the
restrictive measures have been eased in certain geographic locations, the U.S.
economy has begun to recover, and with the availability and distribution of
COVID-19 vaccines, we anticipate continued improvements in commercial and
consumer activity and the U.S. economy. While positive signs exist, we recognize
that certain of our customers are experiencing varying degrees of financial
distress, which may continue, especially if new COVID-19 variant infections
increase and new economic restrictions are mandated.

In 2020, we experienced a significant decline in the loan portfolio due to a
lack of customer demand for loans resulting from the effects of COVID-19 and
related government stimulus programs. These impacts resulted in a lower level of
direct marketing expense and materially lower credit losses during 2020 and
continuing into early 2021. Beginning in the second quarter of 2021, we
experienced a return of demand for the loan products that we, and the bank
originators we support, offer, resulting in significant growth in the loan
portfolio from that point. This significant loan portfolio growth resulted in
compressed margins in 2021 due to the upfront costs associated with marketing
and credit provisioning expense related to growing and "rebuilding" the loan
portfolio from the impacts of COVID-19. We continue to target loan portfolio
originations within our target CACs of $250-$300 and credit quality metrics of
45-55% of revenue which, when combined with our expectation of continuing
customer loan demand for our portfolio products, we believe will allow us to
return to our historical performance levels prior to COVID-19 after initially
resulting in earnings compression.



                                       41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Both we and the bank originators are closely monitoring the key credit quality
indicators such as payment defaults, continued payment deferrals, and line of
credit utilization. While we initially anticipated that the COVID-19 pandemic
would have a negative impact on our credit quality, instead the monetary
stimulus programs provided by the US government to our customer base have
generally allowed customers to continue making payments on their loans. At the
beginning of the pandemic, we expected an increase in net charge-offs as
compared to prior periods but experienced historically low net charge-offs as a
percentage of revenue in the second half of 2020 and early 2021. With the
increased volume of new customer loans we originated in the third and fourth
quarters of 2021 as we grew the loan portfolio to a level that approximated our
pre-pandemic size and the ending of government assistance, we are experiencing a
short-term increase in net charge-offs in excess of our targeted range with an
expectation of net charge-offs returning to our targeted range of 45-55% of
revenue as the portfolio becomes more seasoned with a balance of new and
returning customers, in the second half of 2022.

We have implemented a hybrid remote environment where employees may choose to
work primarily from the office or from home and gather collectively in the
office on a limited basis. We have sought to ensure our employees feel secure in
their jobs, have flexibility in their work location and have the resources they
need to stay safe and healthy. As a 100% online lending solutions provider, our
technology and underwriting platform has continued to serve our customers and
the bank originators that we support without any material interruption in
services.

COVID-19 has had a significant adverse impact on our business, and while
uncertainty still exists, we believe we are well-positioned to operate
effectively through the present economic environment and expect continued loan
portfolio growth and strong credit quality into the next year. We will continue
assessing our minimum cash and liquidity requirement, monitoring our debt
covenant compliance and implementing measures to ensure that our cash and
liquidity position is maintained through the current economic cycle.

KEY FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL INDICATORS


As discussed above, we regularly monitor a number of metrics in order to measure
our current performance and project our future performance. These metrics aid us
in developing and refining our growth strategies and in making strategic
decisions.

Certain of our metrics are non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that such
metrics are useful in period-to-period comparisons of our core business.
However, non-GAAP financial measures are not an alternative to any measure of
financial performance calculated and presented in accordance with US GAAP. See
"-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures to
US GAAP.

Revenues

                                                                                        As of and for the three months ended
                                                                                                      March 31,
Revenue metrics (dollars in thousands, except as noted)                                       2022                   2021
Revenues                                                                               $     124,244            $    89,733
Period-over-period change in revenue                                                              38    %               (45) %
Ending combined loans receivable - principal(1)                                        $     511,319            $   353,089
Average combined loans receivable - principal(1)(2)                                    $     535,857            $   378,877
Total combined loans originated - principal                                            $     205,487            $   133,514
Average customer loan balance(3)                                                       $       1,993            $     1,817
Number of new customer loans                                                                  19,303                 13,890
Ending number of combined loans outstanding                                                  256,615                194,331
Customer acquisition costs                                                             $         323            $       316
Effective APR of combined loan portfolio                                                          93    %                96  %


_________

(1)Combined loans receivable is defined as loans owned by us and consolidated
VIEs plus loans originated and owned by third-party lenders pursuant to our CSO
programs. See "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and for a
reconciliation of Combined loans receivable to Loans receivable, net, / Loans
receivable at fair value, the most directly comparable financial measures
calculated in accordance with US GAAP.
(2)Average combined loans receivable - principal is calculated using an average
of daily Combined loans receivable - principal balances.
(3)Average customer loan balance is an average of all three products and is
calculated for each product by dividing the ending Combined loans receivable -
principal by the number of loans outstanding at period end.

Revenues. Our revenue is made up of Rise finance fees, Rise CSO fees (which are fees we receive from customers who obtain a loan through the CSO program for credit services, including loan guarantee, which we provide), revenue earned from the Elastic line of credit, and finance charges and fee revenue from the Today Card credit card product. See ”Components of Our Results of Operations – Revenues”.

                                       42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ending and average combined loans receivable - principal.   We calculate the
average combined loans receivable - principal by taking a simple daily average
of the ending combined loans receivable - principal for each period. Key metrics
that drive the ending and average combined loans receivable - principal include
the amount of loans originated in a period and the average customer loan
balance. All loan balance metrics include only the 90% participation in the
related Elastic line of credit advances (we exclude the 10% held by Republic
Bank), the 96% participation in FinWise Bank originated Rise installment loans
and the 95% participation in CCB originated Rise installment loans and the 95%
participation in the CCB originated Today Card credit card receivables, but
include the full loan balances on CSO loans, which are not presented on our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Total combined loans originated - principal.  The amount of loans originated in
a period is driven primarily by loans to new customers as well as new loans to
prior customers, including refinancing of existing loans to customers in good
standing.

Average customer loan balance and effective APR of combined loan portfolio.
The average loan amount and its related APR are based on the product and the
underlying credit quality of the customer. Generally, better credit quality
customers are offered higher loan amounts at lower APRs. Additionally, new
customers have more potential risk of loss than prior or existing customers due
to lack of payment history and the potential for fraud. As a result, newer
customers typically will have lower loan amounts and higher APRs to compensate
for that additional risk of loss. The effective APR is calculated based on the
actual amount of finance charges generated from a customer loan divided by the
average outstanding balance for the loan and can be lower than the stated APR on
the loan due to waived finance charges and other reasons. For example, a Rise
customer may receive a $2,000 installment loan with a term of 24 months and a
stated rate of 130%. In this example, the customer's monthly installment loan
payment would be $236.72. As the customer can prepay the loan balance at any
time with no additional fees or early payment penalty, the customer pays the
loan in full in month eight. The customer's loan earns interest of $1,657.39
over the eight-month period and has an average outstanding balance of $1,912.37.
The effective APR for this loan is 130% over the eight-month period calculated
as follows:

($1,657.39 interest earned / $1,912.37 average outstanding balance) x 12 months per year = 130%

8 months


In addition, as an example for Elastic, if a customer makes a $2,500 draw on the
customer's line of credit and this draw required bi-weekly minimum payments of
5% (equivalent to 20 bi-weekly payments), and if all minimum payments are made,
the draw would earn finance charges of $1,125. The effective APR for the line of
credit in this example is 107% over the payment period and is calculated as
follows:

($1,125.00 fees earned / $1,369.05 average unpaid balance) x 26 fortnight periods per year = 107%

20 payments


The actual total revenue we realize on a loan portfolio is also impacted by the
amount of prepayments and charged-off customer loans in the portfolio. For a
single loan, on average, we typically expect to realize approximately 60% of the
revenues that we would otherwise realize if the loan were to fully amortize at
the stated APR. From the Rise example above, if we waived $350 of interest for
this customer, the effective APR for this loan would decrease to 103%. From the
Elastic example above, if we waived $125 of fees for this customer, the
effective APR for this loan would decrease to 95%.

Number of new customer loans.  We define a new customer loan as the first loan
or advance made to a customer for each of our products (so a customer receiving
a Rise installment loan and then at a later date taking their first cash advance
on an Elastic line of credit would be counted twice). The number of new customer
loans is subject to seasonal fluctuations. New customer acquisition is typically
slowest during the first six months of each calendar year, primarily in the
first quarter, compared to the latter half of the year, as our existing and
prospective customers usually receive tax refunds during this period and, thus,
have less of a need for loans from us. Further, many customers will use their
tax refunds to prepay all or a portion of their loan balance during this period,
so our overall loan portfolio typically decreases during the first quarter of
the calendar year. Overall loan portfolio growth and the number of new customer
loans tends to accelerate during the summer months (typically June and July), at
the beginning of the school year (typically late August to early September) and
during the winter holidays (typically late November to early December).

Customer acquisition costs.  A key expense metric we monitor related to loan
growth is our CAC. This metric is the amount of direct marketing costs incurred
during a period divided by the number of new customer loans originated during
that same period. New loans to former customers are not included in our
calculation of CAC (except to the extent they receive a loan through a different
product) as we believe we incur no material direct marketing costs to make
additional loans to a prior customer through the same product.



                                       43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following tables summarize the evolution of customer loans by product for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021.

                                                                   Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
                                                Rise                    Elastic                 Today
                                                                       (Lines of
                                         (Installment Loans)            Credit)             (Credit Card)             Total
Beginning number of combined
loans outstanding                              134,414                   110,628                  35,464              280,506
New customer loans originated                   12,147                     4,392                   2,764               19,303
Former customer loans originated                15,702                       136                       -               15,838
Attrition                                      (44,187)                  (12,183)                 (2,662)             (59,032)
Ending number of combined loans
outstanding                                    118,076                   102,973                  35,566              256,615
Customer acquisition cost (in
dollars)                                $          330              $        462          $           70          $       323
Average customer loan balance (in
dollars)                                $        2,341              $      1,806          $        1,376          $     1,993



                                                                   Three Months Ended March 31, 2021
                                                Rise                    Elastic                 Today
                                                                       (Lines of
                                         (Installment Loans)            Credit)             (Credit Card)             Total
Beginning number of combined
loans outstanding                              103,940                   100,105                  10,803              214,848
New customer loans originated                    8,656                     2,852                   2,382               13,890
Former customer loans originated                12,856                        94                       -               12,950
Attrition                                      (33,944)                  (13,030)                   (383)             (47,357)
Ending number of combined loans
outstanding                                     91,508                    90,021                  12,802              194,331
Customer acquisition cost (in
dollars)                                $          327              $        475          $           83          $       316
Average customer loan balance (in
dollars)                                $        2,209              $      1,514          $        1,149          $     1,817



Recent trends.  Our revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2022 totaled
$124.2 million, an increase of 38% versus the three months ended March 31, 2021.
The increase in quarterly revenue is primarily attributable to higher average
combined loans receivable-principal as we saw growth in all of our products in
the first quarter of 2022. Rise, Elastic, and the Today products experienced
year-over-year increases in revenues of 38%, 29%, and 254%, respectively, which
were attributable to increases in year-over-year average loan balances as we
focused on growing the portfolios beginning in the second half of 2021. The
Today Card balances increased significantly over the past year due to an
increase in marketing and origination activity during the second half of 2021,
and due to the nature of the product which provides an added convenience of
having a credit card for online purchases of day-to-day items such as groceries
or clothing (whereas the primary usage of a Rise installment loan or Elastic
line of credit is for emergency financial needs such as a medical deductible or
automobile repair).

We experienced an increase in new and former customers as demand for the loan
products provided by us and the bank originators increased beginning in the
second quarter of 2021 and continuing through the first quarter of 2022. This is
in contrast to 2020 and early 2021 when the portfolio of loan products
experienced significantly decreased loan demand for both new and former
customers due to COVID-19, including the effects of monetary stimulus provided
by the US government reducing demand for loan products. All three of our
products experienced an increase in principal loan balances in the first quarter
of 2022 compared to a year ago. Rise and Elastic principal loan balances at
March 31, 2022 totaled $276.4 million and $186.0 million, respectively, up
roughly $74.3 million and $49.7 million, respectively, from a year ago. Today
Card principal loan balances at March 31, 2022 totaled $48.9 million, up $34.2
million from a year ago.



                                       44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our CAC was slightly higher in the first quarter of 2022 at $323 as compared to
the first quarter of 2021 at $316, with the first quarter CAC generally higher
than our targeted range of $250-$300 due to the seasonal decrease in loan demand
due to income tax refunds in the first quarter of each year. The new customer
loan volume is being sourced from all our marketing channels including direct
mail, strategic partners and digital. We've seen a marked improvement in loan
volume from our strategic partners channel where we have improved our technology
and risk capabilities to interface with the strategic partners via our
application programming interface (APIs) that we developed within our new
technology platform ("Blueprint"). Blueprint will allow us to more efficiently
acquire new customers within our targeted CAC range. We believe our CAC in
future quarters, and on an annual basis, will continue to remain within or below
our target range of $250 to $300 as we continue to optimize the efficiency of
our marketing channels and continue to grow the Today Card which successfully
generated new customers at a sub-$100 CAC.

Credit quality


                                                                         As 

from and for the three months ended March, 31stCredit quality measures (in thousands of dollars), after adopting fair value

                                                                      2022               2021 (Pro-forma)(6)
Net charge-offs(1)                                                       $      76,819            $           30,890
Net change in fair value(1)(6)                                                   7,340                         4,667
Total change in fair value of loans receivable (6)                       $      84,159            $           35,557

Net charge-offs as a percentage of revenues (1)                                     62    %                       34  %
Total change in fair value of loans receivable as a percentage of
revenues(6)                                                                         68    %                       40  %
Percentage past due                                                                 11    %                        6  %
Fair value premium(6)                                                               10    %                       13  %


                                                                              As of and for the three months ended
                                                                                            March 31,

Credit quality measures (in thousands of dollars), before the adoption of fair value

                                                                                    2021
Net charge-offs(2)                                                            $                      30,890
Additional provision for loan losses(2)                                                              (9,920)
Provision for loan losses                                                     $                      20,970

Total provision for loan losses as a percentage of revenues                                              23       %
Net charge-offs as a percentage of revenues(2)                                                           34       %
Percentage past due                                                                                       6       %
Combined loan loss reserve(4)                                                 $                      39,159
Combined loan loss reserve as a percentage of combined loans
receivable(3)(4)(5)                                                                                      10       %


_________

(1)Net charge-offs and net change in fair value of loans receivable are not
financial measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Net charge-offs include
the amount of principal and accrued interest on loans that are more than 60 days
past due (Rise and Elastic) or 120 days past due (Today Card), or sooner if we
receive notice that the loan will not be collected, such as a bankruptcy notice
or identified fraud, offset by any recoveries. Net change in fair value reflects
the adjustment recognized related to the change in the fair value mark during
the reported period. See "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and
for a reconciliation to Change in fair value of loans receivable, the most
directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with US GAAP.
(2)Net charge-offs and additional provision for loan losses are not financial
measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Net charge-offs include the amount
of principal and accrued interest on loans that are more than 60 days past due
(Rise and Elastic) or 120 days past due (Today Card), or sooner if we receive
notice that the loan will not be collected, such as a bankruptcy notice or
identified fraud, offset by any recoveries. Additional provision for loan losses
is the amount of provision for loan losses needed for a particular period to
adjust the combined loan loss reserve to the appropriate level in accordance
with our underlying loan loss reserve methodology. See "-Non-GAAP Financial
Measures" for more information and for a reconciliation to Provision for loan
losses, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance
with US GAAP.
(3)Combined loans receivable is defined as loans owned by us and consolidated
VIEs plus loans originated and owned by third-party lenders pursuant to our CSO
programs. See "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and for a
reconciliation of Combined loans receivable to Loans receivable, net, the most
directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with US GAAP.
(4)Combined loan loss reserve is defined as the loan loss reserve for loans
originated and owned by us and consolidated VIEs plus the loan loss reserve for
loans owned by third-party lenders and guaranteed by us. See "-Non-GAAP
Financial Measures" for more information and for a reconciliation of Combined
loan loss reserve to Allowance for loan losses, the most directly comparable
financial measure calculated in accordance with US GAAP.
(5)Combined loan loss reserve as a percentage of combined loans receivable is
determined using period-end balances.



                                       45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(6)We have provided pro-forma information reflecting the adoption of fair value
in the 2021 financial period to provide comparability to the 2022 financial
period. See "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and for a
reconciliation to previously reported amounts for 2021 calculated in accordance
with US GAAP. The pro-forma fair value adjustments reflect fair value
methodology acceptable with US GAAP.

Net principal charge-offs as a percentage of
average combined loans receivable - principal                First              Second               Third              Fourth
(1)(2)(3)                                                   Quarter             Quarter             Quarter             Quarter
2022                                                          11%                 N/A                 N/A                 N/A
2021                                                          6%                  5%                  6%                  10%
2020                                                          11%                 10%                 4%                  5%


_________

(1)Net principal charge-offs is comprised of gross principal charge-offs less
recoveries.
(2)Average combined loans receivable - principal is calculated using an average
of daily Combined loans receivable - principal balances during each quarter.
(3)Combined loans receivable is defined as loans owned by us and consolidated
VIEs plus loans originated and owned by third-party lenders pursuant to our CSO
programs. See "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and for a
reconciliation of Combined loans receivable to the most directly comparable
financial measure calculated in accordance with US GAAP.

Net principal charge-offs as a percentage of average combined loans
receivable-principal for the first quarter of 2022 is higher than the first
quarter of 2021 and consistent with this credit metric during 2019 and the first
quarter of 2020. The above chart depicts the historically low charge-off metrics
from the third quarter of 2020 through the third quarter of 2021, due to
COVID-19 pandemic impacts such as a lack of new customer demand, our
implementation of payment assistance tools, and government stimulus payments
received by our customers. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2021, net
principal charge-offs as a percentage of average combined loans
receivable-principal have returned to the levels consistent with 2019 due to the
increased volume of new customers being originated as we rebuilt the loan
portfolio from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the second half of 2021
and return to a more normalized credit profile.

Upon adoption of fair value for the combined loans receivable portfolio on
January 1, 2022, in reviewing the credit quality of our loan portfolio, we break
out our total change in fair value in loans receivable that is presented on our
Condensed Combined Statement of Operations under US GAAP into two separate
items-net charge-offs and net change in fair value. Net charge-offs are
indicative of the credit quality of our underlying portfolio, while net change
in fair value is subject to more fluctuation based on loan portfolio growth and
changes in assumptions used in the fair value methodology. The net change in
fair value is the change in the reporting period between the current period fair
value mark as compared to the beginning of period fair value mark. With all
other assumptions held flat and a fair value premium associated with the
combined loan portfolio, we would expect the net change in fair value to be
positive in periods of growth in the loan portfolio and expect the net change in
fair value to be negative in periods of attrition in the loan portfolio.

Net charge-offs. Net charge-offs comprise gross charge-offs offset by recoveries
on prior charge-offs. Gross charge-offs include the amount of principal and
accrued interest on loans that are more than 60 days past due (Rise and Elastic)
or 120 days (Today Card), or sooner if we receive notice that the loan will not
be collected, such as a bankruptcy notice or identified fraud. Any payments
received on loans that have been charged off are recorded as recoveries and
reduce the total amount of gross charge-offs. Recoveries are typically less than
10% of the amount charged off, and thus, we do not view recoveries as a key
credit quality metric.

Net charge-offs as a percentage of revenues can vary based on several factors,
such as whether or not we experience significant growth or lower the APR of our
products. Additionally, although a more seasoned portfolio will typically result
in lower net charge-offs as a percentage of revenues, we do not intend to drive
down this ratio significantly below our historical ratios and would instead seek
to offer our existing products to a broader new customer base to drive
additional revenues.

Net charge-offs as a percentage of average combined loans receivable-principal
allow us to determine credit quality and evaluate loss experience trends across
our loan portfolio.



                                       46
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net change in fair value. Beginning January 1, 2022, we utilize the fair value
option on the combined loans receivable portfolio. As such, loans receivables
are carried at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with
changes in fair value recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. To derive the fair value, we generally utilize discounted cash flow
analyses that factor in estimated losses and prepayments over the estimated
duration of the underlying assets. Loss and prepayment assumptions are
determined using historical loss data and include appropriate consideration of
recent trends and anticipated future performance. Hence, another key credit
quality metric we monitor is the percentage of past due combined loans
receivable - principal, as an increase in past due loans is a consideration in
the credit loss assumption used in the fair value assumptions as a significant
increase in the percentage of past due loans may indicate a future increase in
credit loss in the portfolio. As such, changes in credit quality, amongst other
significant assumptions, typically have a more significant impact on the
carrying value of the combined loans receivable portfolio under the fair value
option. Future cash flows are discounted using a rate of return that we believe
a market participant would require. Accrued and unpaid interest and fees are
included in Loans receivable at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets.

Additional provision for loan losses.  For financial data prior to January 1,
2022, in reviewing the credit quality of our loan portfolio, we broke out our
total provision for loan losses that was presented on our statement of
operations under US GAAP into two separate items-net charge-offs (as discussed
above) and additional provision for loan losses. The additional provision for
loan losses is the amount needed to adjust the combined loan loss reserve to the
appropriate amount at the end of each month based on our loan loss reserve
methodology.

Additional provision for loan losses relates to an increase in inherent losses
in the loan portfolio as determined by our loan loss reserve methodology. This
increase could be due to a combination of factors such as an increase in the
size of the loan portfolio or a worsening of credit quality or increase in past
due loans. It is also possible for the additional provision for loan losses for
a period to be a negative amount, which would reduce the amount of the combined
loan loss reserve needed (due to a decrease in the loan portfolio or improvement
in credit quality). The amount of additional provision for loan losses is
seasonal in nature, mirroring the seasonality of our new customer acquisition
and overall loan portfolio growth, as discussed above. The combined loan loss
reserve typically decreased during the first quarter or first half of the
calendar year due to a decrease in the loan portfolio from year end. Then, as
the rate of growth for the loan portfolio started to increase during the second
half of the year, additional provision for loan losses was typically needed to
increase the reserve for losses associated with the loan growth. Because of
this, our provision for loan losses varied significantly throughout the year
without a significant change in the credit quality of our portfolio.

Loan loss reserve methodology prior to January 1, 2022.  Our loan loss reserve
methodology was calculated separately for each product and, in the case of Rise
loans originated under the state lending model (including CSO program loans),
was calculated separately based on the state in which each customer resides to
account for varying state license requirements that affect the amount of the
loan offered, repayment terms and other factors. For each product, loss factors
were calculated based on the delinquency status of customer loan balances:
current, 1 to 30 days past due, 31 to 60 days past due or 61-120 past due (for
Today Card only). These loss factors for loans in each delinquency status were
based on average historical loss rates by product (or state) associated with
each of these three delinquency categories.

Recent trends.  Total change in fair value of loans receivable for the three
months ended March 31, 2022 and pro-forma three months ended March 31, 2021, was
68% and 40% of revenues, respectively, (See "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for
more information and for a reconciliation to previously reported amounts for
2021 calculated in accordance with US GAAP.). Net charge-offs as a percentage of
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 were 62% and 34%,
respectively. The increase in net charge-offs as a percentage of revenues is due
to the increase in originations beginning in the second half of 2021 with a
heavier mix of new customers into the loan portfolio which have a higher credit
loss profile than returning customers. We expect the second quarter net
charge-offs as a percentage of revenue to be at the high end of our target range
of 45-55% of revenue and will return within our target range during the second
half of 2022 as the mix of new and returning customers in the portfolio
normalizes. We continue to monitor the portfolio during the economic recovery
resulting from COVID-19 and recent macro-economic factors and will adjust our
underwriting and credit policies to mitigate any potential negative impacts as
needed.

Past due loan balances at March 31, 2022 were 11% of total combined loans
receivable-principal, up from 6% from a year ago, due to the number of new
customers originated beginning in the second quarter of 2021 which is consistent
with our historical past due percentages prior to the pandemic. We, and the bank
originators we support, are no longer offering specific COVID-19 payment
deferral programs but continue to offer other payment flexibility programs if
certain qualifications are met. We are continuing to see that most customers are
meeting their scheduled payments once they exit the payment deferral program.



                                       47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net change in fair value as a percentage of revenue was 6% for both March 31,
2022 and pro-forma March 31, 2021, as the fair value premium was relatively flat
with the fair value premiums calculated during the prior reporting periods (See
"-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and for a reconciliation to
previously reported amounts for 2021 calculated in accordance with US GAAP.).
The fair value premium of the combined loans receivable-principal portfolio was
10% at March 31, 2022 compared to 13% at March 31, 2021 due to the composition
of the loan portfolio with an increased mix of newly originated loans at March
31, 2022 as compared to a more mature loan portfolio at March 31, 2021 due to
limited origination activity and significant paydowns experienced in the
portfolio due to the effects of COVID-19. The key assumptions used in the fair
value estimate at March 31, 2022 and 2021 are as follows:

                         March 31, 2022
Credit loss rate                   17  %
Prepayment rate                    27  %
Discount rate                      21  %



Total loan loss provision for the three months ended March 31, 2021, and prior
to the adoption of fair value, which was below our targeted range of
approximately 45% to 55%, was 23% of revenues. Net charge-offs as a percentage
of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2021 was 34% due to reduced
demand and limited loan origination activity in 2020 and early 2021 coupled with
customers' receipt of monetary stimulus provided by the US government which
allowed customers to continue making payments on their loans.

The combined loan loss reserve as a percentage of combined loans receivable
totaled 10% as of March 31, 2021. The lower historical combined loan loss
reserve rate reflects the strong credit performance of the portfolio at March
31, 2021 due to the mature nature of the portfolio resulting from limited new
loan origination activity in 2020 and early 2021.



                                       48
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We also look at Rise and Elastic principal loan charge-offs (including both
credit and fraud losses) by loan vintage as a percentage of combined loans
originated-principal. As the below table shows, our cumulative principal loan
charge-offs for Rise and Elastic through March 31, 2022 for each annual vintage
since the 2013 vintage are generally under 30% and continue to generally trend
at or slightly below our 20% to 25% long-term targeted range. Our payment
deferral programs and monetary stimulus programs provided by the US government
in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have also assisted in reducing losses in
our 2019 and 2020 vintages coupled with a lower volume of new loan originations
in our 2020 vintage. While still early, we would expect the 2021 vintage to be
at or near 2018 levels or slightly lower given the increased volume of new
customer loans originated during the second half of 2021. It is also possible
that the cumulative loss rates on all vintages will increase and may exceed our
recent historical cumulative loss experience due to the economic impact of a
prolonged crisis resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic or the current
inflationary environment.[[Image Removed: elvt-20220331_g2.jpg]]

_________

1) The 2020 and 2021 vintages are not yet fully ripe from the point of view of losses. 2) UK included in 2013 to 2017 vintages only.



We also look at Today Card principal loan charge-offs (including both credit and
fraud losses) by account vintage as a percentage of account principal
originations. As the below table shows, our cumulative principal credit card
charge-offs through March 31, 2022 for the 2020 annual vintage is under 8%.
While our 2021 account vintage is currently performing better than 2020, we
expect the 2021 account vintage to have losses higher than the 2020 account
vintage based on the volume of new customers originated in the second half of
2021 and the performance of certain segments upon the release of the credit
model during 2021. The Today Card requires accounts to be charged off that are
more than 120 days past due which results in a longer maturity period for the
cumulative loss curve related to this portfolio. Our 2018 and 2019 vintages are
considered to be test vintages and were comprised of limited originations volume
and not reflective of our current underwriting standards.



                                       49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Image Removed: elvt-20220331_g3.jpg]]

Margins

                                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
Margin metrics (dollars in thousands)               2022                       2021
Revenues                                     $      124,244                 $ 89,733
Net charge-offs(1)                                  (76,819)                 (30,890)
Change in fair value(1)                              (7,340)                       -
Additional provision for loan losses(1)                   -                    9,920
Direct marketing costs                               (6,226)                  (4,383)
Other cost of sales                                  (2,882)                  (2,047)
Gross profit                                         30,977                   62,333
Operating expenses                                  (38,281)                 (37,594)
Operating income (loss)                      $       (7,304)                $ 24,739
As a percentage of revenues:
Net charge-offs                                          62   %                   34  %
Change in fair value                                      6                 

Additional provision for loan losses                      -                      (11)
Direct marketing costs                                    5                        5
Other cost of sales                                       2                        2
Gross margin                                             25                       69
Operating expenses                                       31                       42
Operating margin                                         (6)  %                   28  %


_________

(1) Non-GAAP measure. See “-Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Net Write-offs and Net Change in Fair Value” and “-Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Net Write-offs and Additional Allowance for Loan Losses”.

                                       50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gross margin is calculated as revenues minus cost of sales, or gross profit,
expressed as a percentage of revenues, and operating margin is calculated as
operating income expressed as a percentage of revenues. Due to the negative
impact of COVID-19 on our loan balances and revenue, we are monitoring our
profit margins closely. Long-term, we intend to continue to manage the business
to a targeted 20% operating margin.

Recent operating margin trends.  For the three months ended March 31, 2022, our
operating margin was (6)%, which was a decrease from 28% in the prior year
period, as originally reported, and a decrease of 11% on a pro-forma basis
considering the pro-forma adoption of fair value at the beginning of 2021 (See
"-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and for a reconciliation to
previously reported amounts for 2021 calculated in accordance with US GAAP.).
The margin decreases we are experiencing in 2022 are primarily driven by the
increased net charge-offs in the first quarter of 2022 due to a higher volume of
new customers originated in the loan portfolio during the second half of 2021 as
we rebuilt the portfolio from the impacts of COVID-19. As the portfolio matures
and we manage the mix of new and returning customers to the portfolio, we would
expect our net charge-offs to return to our target range of 45-55% and our gross
margin to normalize in future periods with our past historical performance. The
margins achieved in the first quarter of 2021 are not reflective of our
historical performance due to the limited origination activity in the loan
portfolio during 2020 and early 2021 due to a lack of customer demand resulting
from the effects of COVID-19 and related government stimulus programs. These
impacts resulted in a lower level of direct marketing expense and materially
lower credit losses during the first quarter of 2021 leading to an outsized
gross margin for the period.

Our operating expense metrics have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19
pandemic and its impact on loan balances and revenue. We began to see
improvements in our operating expense metric in the third and fourth quarter of
2021 due to the growth in the portfolio and associated increase in revenue
during those periods as we continued to manage and maintain a relatively
consistent operating expense during the latter half of the year and into the
first quarter of 2022. In the short term, with the continued growth in the loan
portfolio expected in 2022, we expect our expense metrics to continue to improve
and move toward our target range as we focus on growth to increase our new and
former customer loan volume and continue to scale the overall loan portfolio. In
the long term, as we grow the loan portfolio while actively managing our
operating expenses, we expect to see our operating expense metrics return to
approximately 20% of revenue.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES


We believe that the inclusion of the following non-GAAP financial measures in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q can provide a useful measure for
period-to-period comparisons of our core business, provide transparency and
useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our
operating results, and enable investors to better compare our operating
performance with the operating performance of our competitors. Management uses
these non-GAAP financial measures frequently in its decision-making because they
provide supplemental information that facilitates internal comparisons to the
historical operating performance of prior periods and give an additional
indication of our core operating performance. However, non-GAAP financial
measures are not a measure calculated in accordance with US generally accepted
accounting principles, or US GAAP, and should not be considered an alternative
to any measures of financial performance calculated and presented in accordance
with US GAAP. Other companies may calculate these non-GAAP financial measures
differently than we do.


Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin

Adjusted EBITDA represents our net income (loss) adjusted to exclude:

• Net interest expense primarily associated with notes payable under credit facilities used to fund loan portfolios;

•Remuneration in shares;

• Depreciation of fixed assets and intangible assets;

• Gains or losses from an investment using the equity method;

•Settlement related to litigation included in non-operating income; and

•Income taxes.

Adjusted EBITDA margin is Adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue.


Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are useful
supplemental measures to assist management and investors in analyzing the
operating performance of the business and provide greater transparency into the
results of operations of our core business.



                                       51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin should not be considered as
alternatives to net income (loss) or any other performance measure derived in
accordance with US GAAP. Our use of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin
has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in
isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under US
GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

•Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being
depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted
EBITDA does not reflect expected cash capital expenditure requirements for such
replacements or for new capital assets;

•Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes or cash requirements for our working capital requirements; and


•Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest associated with notes payable used
for funding the loan portfolios, for other corporate purposes or tax payments
that may represent a reduction in cash available to us.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin for each of the periods indicated:

                                          Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)                    2022                       2021
Net income (loss)                  $      (13,923)                $ 12,716
Adjustments:
Net interest expense                       12,170                    8,786
Share-based compensation                    1,658                    1,602

Depreciation and amortization               3,761                    5,243

Equity method investment loss                 344                        -
Non-operating income                       (1,666)                    (207)
Income tax expense (benefit)               (4,229)                   3,444
Adjusted EBITDA                    $       (1,885)                $ 31,584

Adjusted EBITDA margin                       (1.5)  %                 35.2  %

Unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information


The following unaudited pro-forma condensed consolidated statement of operations
information reflects the adoption of ASU 2016-13 as of January 1, 2021.
Management has made significant estimates and assumptions in its determination
of the pro-forma accounting adjustments based on certain currently available
information and certain assumptions and methodologies that we believe are
reasonable and consistent with US GAAP. Management believes the pro-forma
financial information is a useful supplemental measure to assist management and
investors in analyzing the operating performance of the business and provide
greater transparency into the results of operations of our core business.



                                       52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Three months completed March 31, 2021

                                                                                       Fair value          Pro-forma financial
(Dollars in thousands)                                    As reported                 adjustments              information
Revenues                                                $     89,733                $           -          $       89,733
Cost of sales:
Provision for loan losses                                     20,970                      (20,970)                      -
Change in fair value of loans receivable                           -                       35,557                  35,557
Direct marketing and other costs of sales                      6,430                            -                   6,430
Total costs of sales                                          27,400                       14,587                  41,987
Gross profit                                                  62,333                      (14,587)                 47,746
Total operating expenses                                      37,594                            -                  37,594
Operating income                                              24,739                      (14,587)                 10,152

Total other expense                                           (8,579)                           -                  (8,579)
Income before taxes                                           16,160                      (14,587)                  1,573
Income tax expense                                             3,444                       (2,940)                    504
Net income                                              $     12,716                $     (11,647)         $        1,069

Basic earnings per share                                $       0.35                $       (0.32)         $         0.03
Diluted earnings per share                              $       0.34                $       (0.31)         $         0.03

Adjusted EBITDA                                         $     31,584                $     (14,587)         $       16,997
Adjusted EBITDA margin                                          35.2   %                                             18.9     %


Free cash flow

Free cash flow (“FCF”) represents our net cash provided by operating activities, adjusted to include:

• Net write-offs – capital loans combined; and

• Capital expenditures.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the net cash provided by operating activities to the FCF for each of the periods indicated:

                                                         Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)                                        2022                    2021

Net cash from operating activities(1) $49,935

        $ 31,880
Adjustments:
Net charge-offs - combined principal loans                 (59,793)                 (22,632)
Capital expenditures                                        (6,277)                  (3,383)
FCF                                               $        (16,135)                $  5,865


 _________

(1) Net cash from operating activities includes net charges – combined finance costs.




                                       53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net charges and net change in fair value


We break out our total change in fair value into two separate items-first, the
amount related to net charge-offs, and second, net change in fair value needed
to adjust the current period fair value mark from the fair value mark from the
beginning of the reporting period. We believe this presentation provides more
detail related to the components of our total change in fair value when
analyzing the gross margin of our business.

Net charge-offs.  Net charge-offs comprise gross charge-offs offset by
recoveries on prior charge-offs. Gross charge-offs include the amount of
principal and accrued interest on loans that are more than 60 days past due
(Rise and Elastic) or 120 days (Today Card), or sooner if we receive notice that
the loan will not be collected, such as a bankruptcy notice or identified fraud.
Any payments received on loans that have been charged off are recorded as
recoveries and reduce total gross charge-offs.

Net change in fair value.  The net change in fair value is the change in the
reporting period between the current period fair value mark as compared to the
beginning of period fair value mark. With all other assumptions held flat and
fair value premium associated with the combined loan portfolio, we would expect
the net change in fair value to be positive in periods of growth in the loan
portfolio and expect the net change in fair value to be negative in periods of
attrition in the loan portfolio.

                                                                                Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)                                                       2022                2021 (pro-forma)(1)

Net charge-offs                                                       $        76,819          $             30,890
Net change in fair value                                                        7,340                         4,667
Total change in fair value of loans receivable                        $        84,159          $             35,557


_________

(1)We have provided pro-forma information reflecting the adoption of fair value
in the 2021 financial period to provide comparability to the 2022 financial
period. See "-Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and for a
reconciliation to previously reported amounts for 2021 calculated in accordance
with US GAAP. The pro-forma fair value adjustments reflect fair value
methodology acceptable with US GAAP.

Net write-offs and additional provision for loan losses


We break out our total provision for loan losses into two separate items-first,
the amount related to net charge-offs, and second, the additional provision for
loan losses needed to adjust the combined loan loss reserve to the appropriate
amount at the end of each month based on our loan loss provision methodology. We
believe this presentation provides more detail related to the components of our
total provision for loan losses when analyzing the gross margin of our business.

Net charge-offs.  Net charge-offs comprise gross charge-offs offset by
recoveries on prior charge-offs. Gross charge-offs include the amount of
principal and accrued interest on loans that are more than 60 days past due
(Rise and Elastic) or 120 days (Today Card), or sooner if we receive notice that
the loan will not be collected, such as a bankruptcy notice or identified fraud.
Any payments received on loans that have been charged off are recorded as
recoveries and reduce total gross charge-offs.

Additional provision for loan losses.  Additional provision for loan losses is
the amount of provision for loan losses needed for a particular period to adjust
the combined loan loss reserve to the appropriate level in accordance with our
underlying loan loss reserve methodology.

                                                 Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)                                       2021

Net charge-offs                                 $                      30,890
Additional provision for loan losses                                   (9,920)
Provision for loan losses                       $                      20,970


Combined loan information

The Elastic line of credit product is originated by a third-party lender,
Republic Bank, which initially provides all of the funding for that product.
Republic Bank retains 10% of the balances of all of the loans originated and
sells a 90% loan participation in the Elastic lines of credit to a third-party
SPV, Elastic SPV, Ltd. Elevate is required to consolidate Elastic SPV, Ltd. as a
VIE under US GAAP and the condensed consolidated financial statements include
revenue, losses and loans receivable related to the 90% of Elastic lines of
credit originated by Republic Bank and sold to Elastic SPV.



                                       54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018, we started licensing our Rise
installment loan brand to a third-party lender, FinWise Bank, which originates
Rise installment loans in 17 states. FinWise Bank retains 4% of the balances of
all the loans originated and sells a 96% participation to a third-party SPV, EF
SPV, Ltd. We do not own EF SPV, but we are required to consolidate EF SPV as a
VIE under US GAAP and the condensed consolidated financial statements include
revenue, losses and loans receivable related to the 96% of Rise installment
loans originated by FinWise Bank and sold to EF SPV.

Beginning in 2018, we started licensing the Today Card brand and our
underwriting services and platform to launch a credit card product originated by
CCB, which initially provides all of the funding for that product. CCB retains
5% of the credit card receivable balance of all the receivables originated and
sells a 95% participation in the Today Card credit card receivables to us. The
Today Card program began expanding in 2020.

Beginning in the third quarter of 2020, we also license our Rise installment
loan brand to an additional bank, CCB, which originates Rise installment loans
in three different states than FinWise Bank. Similar to the relationship with
FinWise Bank, CCB retains 5% of the balances of all of the loans originated and
sells the remaining 95% loan participation in those Rise installment loans to EC
SPV. We do not own EC SPV, but we are required to consolidate EC SPV as a VIE
under US GAAP and the condensed consolidated financial statements include
revenue, losses and loans receivable related to the 95% of the Rise installment
loans originated by CCB and sold to EC SPV.

The information presented in the tables below on a combined basis are non-GAAP
measures based on a combined portfolio of loans, which includes the total amount
of outstanding loans receivable that we own and that are on our balance sheets
plus outstanding loans receivable originated and owned by third parties that we
guarantee pursuant to CSO programs in which we participate. There were no new
loan originations in 2021 under our CSO programs, but we continued to have
obligations as the CSO until the wind-down of this portfolio was completed in
the third quarter of 2021. See "-Basis of Presentation and Critical Accounting
Policies-Allowance and liability for estimated losses on consumer loans."

We believe these non-GAAP measures provide investors with important information
needed to evaluate the magnitude of potential loan losses and the opportunity
for revenue performance of the combined loan portfolio on an aggregate basis. We
also believe that the comparison of the combined amounts from period to period
is more meaningful than comparing only the amounts reflected on our balance
sheet since both revenues and cost of sales as reflected in our financial
statements are impacted by the aggregate amount of loans we own and those CSO
loans we guaranteed.

Our use of total combined loans and fees receivable has limitations as an
analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute
for analysis of our results as reported under US GAAP. Some of these limitations
are:

• Rise CSO loans were originated and held by a third party lender; and

• The Rise CSO loans were funded by a third party lender and were not part of the VPC Facility.

At each of the period ends indicated, the following table presents a reconciliation of:

•Loans receivable, net and at fair value, held by the Company (which correspond to our condensed consolidated balance sheets included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q);


•Loans receivable, net, guaranteed by the Company (as disclosed in Note 3 of our
condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q);

•Loans receivable combined (which we use as a non-GAAP measure); and

•Combined loan loss reserve (which we use as a non-GAAP measure).

                                       55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                       2021                                              2022
(Dollars in thousands)                                 March 31           June 30           September 30          December 31          March 31
Company Owned Loans:
Loans receivable - principal, current, company
owned                                                $ 331,251          $ 

372,068 $466,140 $501,552 $457,259
Loans receivable – principal, overdue, company property

                                           21,678             27,231                46,730              57,207             54,060
Loans receivable - principal, total, company
owned                                                  352,929            399,299               512,870             558,759            511,319
Loans receivable - finance charges, company
owned                                                   21,393             19,157                22,960              23,602             22,991
Loans receivable - company owned                       374,322            418,456               535,830             582,361            534,310
Allowance for loan losses on loans receivable,
company owned(5)                                       (39,037)           (40,314)              (56,209)            (71,204)                 -
Fair value adjustment, loans receivable-
principal                                                    -                  -                     -                   -             49,844
Loans receivable, net, company owned / Loans
receivable at fair value                             $ 335,285          $ 378,142          $    479,621          $  511,157          $ 584,154
Third Party Loans Guaranteed by the Company:
Loans receivable - principal, current,
guaranteed by company                                $     145          $   

$17 – $ – $ – Loans receivable – principal, past due, company guaranteed

                                       15                  4                     -                   -                  -
Loans receivable - principal, total,
guaranteed by company(1)                                   160                 21                     -                   -                  -
Loans receivable - finance charges, guaranteed
by company(2)                                               22                  4                     -                   -                  -
Loans receivable - guaranteed by company                   182                 25                     -                   -                  -
Liability for losses on loans receivable,
guaranteed by company                                     (122)                (7)                    -                   -                  -
Loans receivable, net, guaranteed by
company(3)                                           $      60          $      18          $          -          $        -          $       -
Combined Loans Receivable(3):
Combined loans receivable - principal, current       $ 331,396          $ 372,085          $    466,140          $  501,552          $ 457,259
Combined loans receivable - principal, past
due                                                     21,693             27,235                46,730              57,207             54,060
Combined loans receivable - principal                  353,089            399,320               512,870             558,759            511,319
Combined loans receivable - finance charges             21,415             19,161                22,960              23,602             22,991
Combined loans receivable                            $ 374,504          $ 418,481          $    535,830          $  582,361          $ 534,310
Combined Loan Loss Reserve(3):
Allowance for loan losses on loans receivable,
company owned(5)                                     $ (39,037)         $ 

(40,314) ($56,209) ($71,204) $ – Liability for losses on loans receivable, guaranteed by the company

                                     (122)                (7)                    -                   -                  -
Combined loan loss reserve(5)                        $ (39,159)         $ 

(40,321) ($56,209) ($71,204) $ – Combined Loans Receivable – Principal, Overdue(3)

                                               $  21,693          $  

27,235 $46,730 $57,207 $54,060
Combined loans receivable – principal(3)

               353,089            399,320               512,870             558,759            511,319
Percentage past due(1)                                       6  %               7  %                  9  %               10  %              11  %
Combined loan loss reserve as a percentage of
combined loans receivable(3)(4)(5)                          10  %              10  %                 11  %               12  %               -  %
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of
loans receivable - company owned(5)                         10  %              10  %                 11  %               12  %               -  %
Fair value adjustment, combined loans
receivable- principal(6)                             $  44,458          $  

51,078 $50,036 $57,184 $49,844


Combined loans receivable at fair value(6)             418,962            469,559               585,866             639,545            584,154
Fair value as a percentage of combined loans
receivable- principal(3)(6)                                113  %             113  %                110  %              110  %             110  %


_________
(1)Represents loans originated by third-party lenders through the CSO programs,
which are not included in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The
wind-down of the CSO program was completed in the third quarter of 2021.
(2)Represents finance charges earned by third-party lenders through the CSO
programs, which are not included in our condensed consolidated financial
statements. The wind-down of the CSO program was completed in the third quarter
of 2021.
(3)Non-GAAP measure
(4)Combined loan loss reserve as a percentage of combined loans receivable is
determined using period-end balances.
(5)Effective January 1, 2022, upon the election to carry the loan portfolio at
fair value, a combined loan loss reserve and allowance for loan losses is no
longer required as a loan loss assumption has been included in the fair value
assumptions for the loan portfolio.
(6)The periods of March 31, 2021 to December 31, 2021 include pro-forma
adjustments reflecting the combined loans receivable at fair value consistent
with a fair value methodology acceptable with U.S. GAAP.





                                       56
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPONENTS OF OUR OPERATING RESULTS

Revenue


Our revenues are composed of Rise finance charges and CSO fees (inclusive of
finance charges attributable to the participation in Rise installment loans
originated by FinWise Bank and CCB), cash advance fees attributable to the
participation in Elastic lines of credit that we consolidate, finance charges
and fee revenues related to the Today Card credit card product (inclusive of
finance charges attributable to the participations in the credit card
receivables originated by CCB), and marketing and licensing fees received from
third-party lenders related to the Rise, Rise CSO, Elastic, and Today Card
products. See "-Overview" above for further information on the structure of
Elastic.

Cost of sales


Change in Fair value. Beginning January 1, 2022, we elected the fair value
option for our loans receivable portfolio. As such, loans receivable are carried
at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in fair
value recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. To derive
the fair value, we generally utilize discounted cash flow analyses that factor
in estimated losses and prepayments over the estimated duration of the
underlying assets. Loss and prepayment assumptions are determined using
historical loss data and include appropriate consideration of recent trends and
anticipated future performance. Future cash flows are discounted using a rate of
return that we believe a market participant would require.

Provision for loan losses. Prior to January 1, 2022, provision for loan losses
consists of amounts charged against income during the period related to net
charge-offs and the additional provision for loan losses needed to adjust the
loan loss reserve to the appropriate amount at the end of each month based on
our loan loss methodology.

Direct marketing costs.  Direct marketing costs consist of online marketing
costs such as sponsored search and advertising on social networking sites, and
other marketing costs such as purchased television and radio advertising and
direct mail print advertising. In addition, direct marketing cost includes
affiliate costs paid to marketers in exchange for referrals of potential
customers. All direct marketing costs are expensed as incurred.

Other cost of sales. Other costs of sales include data verification costs associated with signing up prospective customers and Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) transaction costs associated with funding and making loan payments to customers.

Operating Expenses


Operating expenses consist of compensation and benefits, professional services,
selling and marketing, occupancy and equipment, depreciation and amortization as
well as other miscellaneous expenses.

Benefits and compensation. Salaries and personnel costs, including benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation expenses, constitute the majority of our operating expenses and these costs are determined by our number of employees.


Professional services.  These operating expenses include costs associated with
legal, accounting and auditing, recruiting and outsourced customer support and
collections.

Selling and marketing.  Selling and marketing costs include costs associated
with the use of agencies that perform creative services and monitor and measure
the performance of the various marketing channels. Selling and marketing costs
also include the production costs associated with media advertisements that are
expensed as incurred over the licensing or production period. These expenses do
not include direct marketing costs incurred to acquire customers, which
comprises CAC.

Occupancy and equipment. Occupancy and equipment includes rental charges for our leased facilities, as well as telephony and web hosting charges.


Depreciation and amortization.  We capitalize all acquisitions of property and
equipment of $500 or greater as well as certain software development costs.
Costs incurred in the preliminary stages of software development are expensed.
Costs incurred thereafter, including external direct costs of materials and
services as well as payroll and payroll-related costs, are capitalized.
Post-development costs are expensed. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable assets.








                                       57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other expenses


Net interest expense.  Net interest expense primarily includes the interest
expense associated with the VPC Facility that funds the Rise installment loans,
the ESPV Facility related to the Elastic lines of credit and related Elastic SPV
entity, the EF SPV and EC SPV Facilities that fund Rise installment loans
originated by FinWise Bank and CCB, respectively, the TSPV facility used to fund
credit card receivable purchases, and the Pine Hill subordinated debt facility
used to fund working capital. Interest expense also includes any amortization of
deferred debt issuance cost and prepayment penalties incurred associated with
the debt facilities.

Gain or loss on investment using the equity method. Investment loss under the equity method includes our share of profit or loss associated with an investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary beginning in the first quarter of 2022.

© Edgar Online, source Previews

]]>